qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 2/2] xen-pt: fix Out-of-bounds read


From: Stefano Stabellini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH 2/2] xen-pt: fix Out-of-bounds read
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:00:33 +0000
User-agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)

On Tue, 10 Feb 2015, Gonglei wrote:
> On 2015/2/10 14:39, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Jan 2015, address@hidden wrote:
> >> From: Gonglei <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> The array length of s->real_device.io_regions[] is
> >> "PCI_NUM_REGIONS - 1". Add a check, just make Coverity happy.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/xen/xen_pt_config_init.c | 5 +++++
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/xen/xen_pt_config_init.c b/hw/xen/xen_pt_config_init.c
> >> index 710fe50..3c8b0f1 100644
> >> --- a/hw/xen/xen_pt_config_init.c
> >> +++ b/hw/xen/xen_pt_config_init.c
> >> @@ -443,6 +443,11 @@ static int xen_pt_bar_reg_read(XenPCIPassthroughState 
> >> *s, XenPTReg *cfg_entry,
> >>          return -1;
> >>      }
> >>  
> >> +    if (index == PCI_ROM_SLOT) {
> >> +        XEN_PT_ERR(&s->dev, "Internal error: Access violation at ROM 
> >> BAR.\n");
> >> +        return -1;
> >> +    }
> > 
> > Could you please fix the boundaries of the check just above?
> > Also please avoid using PCI_ROM_SLOT for the array index check, simply
> > use PCI_NUM_REGIONS.
> > 
> You meaning is changing the below check:
> 
> if (index < 0 || index >= PCI_NUM_REGIONS - 1) {
>         XEN_PT_ERR(&s->dev, "Internal error: Invalid BAR index [%d].\n", 
> index);
>         return -1;
>     }
> 
> Isn't it?
 
that's right



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]