qemu-trivial
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-trivial] [PULL 05/26] intc/xilinx_intc: Use qemu_set_irq


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: [Qemu-trivial] [PULL 05/26] intc/xilinx_intc: Use qemu_set_irq
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:50:21 +0400

From: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>

Use qemu_set_irq rather than if-elsing qemu_irq_(lower|raise). No
functional change, just reduces verbosity.

Cc: address@hidden

Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <address@hidden>
---
 hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c |    6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c b/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c
index b106e72..5df7008 100644
--- a/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c
+++ b/hw/intc/xilinx_intc.c
@@ -66,11 +66,7 @@ static void update_irq(struct xlx_pic *p)
         i = ~0;
 
     p->regs[R_IVR] = i;
-    if ((p->regs[R_MER] & 1) && p->regs[R_IPR]) {
-        qemu_irq_raise(p->parent_irq);
-    } else {
-        qemu_irq_lower(p->parent_irq);
-    }
+    qemu_set_irq(p->parent_irq, (p->regs[R_MER] & 1) && p->regs[R_IPR]);
 }
 
 static uint64_t
-- 
1.7.10.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]