[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH for-2.12] cpus.c: ensure running CPU recalculat
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-stable] [PATCH for-2.12] cpus.c: ensure running CPU recalculates icount deadlines on timer expiry |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Apr 2018 13:58:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 26.0.91 |
Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
> When we run in TCG icount mode, we calculate the number of instructions
> to execute using tcg_get_icount_limit(), which ensures that we stop
> execution at the next timer deadline. However there is a bug where
> currently we do not recalculate that limit if the guest reprograms
> a timer so that the next deadline moves closer, and so we will
> continue execution until the original limit and fire the timer
> later than we should.
>
> Fix this bug in qemu_timer_notify_cb(): if we are currently running
> a VCPU in icount mode, we simply need to kick it out of the main
> loop and back to tcg_cpu_exec(), where it will recalculate the
> icount limit. If we are not currently running a VCPU, then we
> retain the existing logic for waking up a halted CPU.
>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1754038
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> Thanks to Paolo for tracking down which function needed fixing!
>
> cpus.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> index 2e6701795b..38eba8bff3 100644
> --- a/cpus.c
> +++ b/cpus.c
> @@ -892,11 +892,19 @@ void qemu_timer_notify_cb(void *opaque, QEMUClockType
> type)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!qemu_in_vcpu_thread() && first_cpu) {
> + if (qemu_in_vcpu_thread()) {
> + /* A CPU is currently running; kick it back out to the
> + * tcg_cpu_exec() loop so it will recalculate its
> + * icount deadline immediately.
> + */
> + qemu_cpu_kick(current_cpu);
This is only totally true if whatever has caused the re-calculation has
ended the Translation Block, otherwise we won't finish until we've run a
few more instructions. I don't know if this could cause a problem if the
timeout was suddenly less than the remaining instructions in the block.
Anyway wording aside:
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> + } else if (first_cpu) {
> /* qemu_cpu_kick is not enough to kick a halted CPU out of
> * qemu_tcg_wait_io_event. async_run_on_cpu, instead,
> * causes cpu_thread_is_idle to return false. This way,
> * handle_icount_deadline can run.
> + * If we have no CPUs at all for some reason, we don't
> + * need to do anything.
> */
> async_run_on_cpu(first_cpu, do_nothing, RUN_ON_CPU_NULL);
> }
--
Alex Bennée