qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 07/16] s390-bios: Decouple channel i/o logic


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v3 07/16] s390-bios: Decouple channel i/o logic from virtio
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:28:32 +0100

On Fri,  1 Mar 2019 13:59:27 -0500
"Jason J. Herne" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Create a separate library for channel i/o related code. This decouples
> channel i/o operations from virtio and allows us to make use of them for
> the real dasd boot path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <address@hidden>
> ---
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile    |  2 +-
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.c       | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h       |  3 +++
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c      |  1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/netboot.mak |  2 +-
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/netmain.c   |  1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h  |  1 -
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c    | 27 ++-------------------------
>  8 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.c
(...)
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..605f6f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +/*
> + * S390 Channel I/O
> + *
> + * Copyright 2017 Alexander Graf & IBM Corp.

This looks a bit odd. Should probably be two copyright lines (one for
agraf, one for IBM) and one author line for you? (Especially as
virtio.c has a 2013 copyright, not 2017.)

> + * Author(s): Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> + *            Jason J. Herne <address@hidden>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
> + * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
> + * directory.
> + */
> +
> +#include "libc.h"
> +#include "s390-ccw.h"
> +#include "cio.h"
> +
> +static char chsc_page[PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
> +
> +int enable_mss_facility(void)
> +{
> +    int ret;
> +    ChscAreaSda *sda_area = (ChscAreaSda *) chsc_page;
> +
> +    memset(sda_area, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> +    sda_area->request.length = 0x0400;
> +    sda_area->request.code = 0x0031;
> +    sda_area->operation_code = 0x2;
> +
> +    ret = chsc(sda_area);
> +    if ((ret == 0) && (sda_area->response.code == 0x0001)) {
> +        return 0;
> +    }
> +    return -EIO;
> +}
> +
> +void enable_subchannel(SubChannelId schid)
> +{
> +    Schib schib;
> +
> +    stsch_err(schid, &schib);
> +    schib.pmcw.ena = 1;
> +    msch(schid, &schib);
> +}

The code movement looks reasonable.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]