qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 1/7] s390x/tod: factor out TOD into separate


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v1 1/7] s390x/tod: factor out TOD into separate device
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 12:49:23 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 04.06.2018 14:14, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:00:43 +0200
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On 04.06.2018 13:38, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:37:02 +0200
>>> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> Let's treat this like a separate device. TCG will have to store the
>>>> actual state/time later on.
>>>>
>>>> Include cpu-qom.h in kvm_s390x.h (due to S390CPU) to compile tod-kvm.c.  
>>>
>>> Can't you include it in tod-kvm.c instead? Why was it not needed before?  
>>
>> Guess I can, kvm_s390x.h looks to me like the right place, as S390CPU is
>> used in there.
>>
>> All other users include "cpu.h" already, so it isn't needed.
> 
> Hm, and for kvm_s390_irq, this file is using a forward declaration,
> which would likely be more awkward for this structure.

I remember that we wanted to use cpu-qom.h for this typedef fun, that's
why I decided to do it this way.

> 
> Header dependencies are always fun :)
> 

So what do you suggest? Thanks!

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]