qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 3/3] s390x/kvm: provide stfle.81


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 3/3] s390x/kvm: provide stfle.81
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:37:54 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0


On 01/17/2018 10:13 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 17.01.2018 20:37, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> stfle.81 (ppa15) is a transparent facility that can be passed to the
>> guest without the need to implement hypervisor support. As this feature
>> can be provided by firmware we add it to all full models.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/s390x/cpu_features.c     | 1 +
>>  target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h | 1 +
>>  target/s390x/gen-features.c     | 1 +
>>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
>> index 5d1c210..1550ab0 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static const S390FeatDef s390_features[] = {
>>      FEAT_INIT("msa4-base", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 77, 
>> "Message-security-assist-extension-4 facility (excluding subfunctions)"),
>>      FEAT_INIT("edat2", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 78, "Enhanced-DAT facility 2"),
>>      FEAT_INIT("dfppc", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 80, "Decimal-floating-point 
>> packed-conversion facility"),
>> +    FEAT_INIT("ppa15", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 81, "PPA15 is installed"),
>>      FEAT_INIT("bpb", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 82, "Branch Prediction Blocking"),
>>      FEAT_INIT("vx", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 129, "Vector facility"),
>>      FEAT_INIT("iep", S390_FEAT_TYPE_STFL, 130, 
>> "Instruction-execution-protection facility"),
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h 
>> b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
>> index 4487cfd..4d93087 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_features_def.h
>> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ typedef enum {
>>      S390_FEAT_MSA_EXT_4,
>>      S390_FEAT_EDAT_2,
>>      S390_FEAT_DFP_PACKED_CONVERSION,
>> +    S390_FEAT_PPA15,
>>      S390_FEAT_BPB,
>>      S390_FEAT_VECTOR,
>>      S390_FEAT_INSTRUCTION_EXEC_PROT,
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> index 95ee870..50bd3f4 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>> @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN7_GA1[] = {
>>      S390_FEAT_SIE_GPERE,
>>      S390_FEAT_SIE_IB,
>>      S390_FEAT_SIE_CEI,
>> +    S390_FEAT_PPA15,
>>      S390_FEAT_BPB,
> 

> Is the order in this list still correct?

Is the order in this array important as well? It seems to work fine. At least 
PPA15 is correctly
ordered vs BPB.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]