qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] target/ppc: Fix lxvw4x, lxvh8x a


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] target/ppc: Fix lxvw4x, lxvh8x and lxvb16x
Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 16:11:53 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 07/05/2019 01:48, Anton Blanchard wrote:

> During the conversion these instructions were incorrectly treated as
> stores. We need to use set_cpu_vsr* and not get_cpu_vsr*.
> 
> Fixes: 8b3b2d75c7c0 ("introduce get_cpu_vsr{l,h}() and set_cpu_vsr{l,h}() 
> helpers for VSR register access")
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c 
> b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
> index 05b75105be..c13f84e745 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
> @@ -102,8 +102,7 @@ static void gen_lxvw4x(DisasContext *ctx)
>      }
>      xth = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>      xtl = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -    get_cpu_vsrh(xth, xT(ctx->opcode));
> -    get_cpu_vsrl(xtl, xT(ctx->opcode));
> +
>      gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
>      EA = tcg_temp_new();
>  
> @@ -126,6 +125,8 @@ static void gen_lxvw4x(DisasContext *ctx)
>          tcg_gen_addi_tl(EA, EA, 8);
>          tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(xtl, EA, ctx->mem_idx, MO_BEQ);
>      }
> +    set_cpu_vsrh(xT(ctx->opcode), xth);
> +    set_cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode), xtl);
>      tcg_temp_free(EA);
>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xth);
>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xtl);
> @@ -185,8 +186,6 @@ static void gen_lxvh8x(DisasContext *ctx)
>      }
>      xth = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>      xtl = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -    get_cpu_vsrh(xth, xT(ctx->opcode));
> -    get_cpu_vsrl(xtl, xT(ctx->opcode));
>      gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
>  
>      EA = tcg_temp_new();
> @@ -197,6 +196,8 @@ static void gen_lxvh8x(DisasContext *ctx)
>      if (ctx->le_mode) {
>          gen_bswap16x8(xth, xtl, xth, xtl);
>      }
> +    set_cpu_vsrh(xT(ctx->opcode), xth);
> +    set_cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode), xtl);
>      tcg_temp_free(EA);
>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xth);
>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xtl);
> @@ -214,14 +215,14 @@ static void gen_lxvb16x(DisasContext *ctx)
>      }
>      xth = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>      xtl = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> -    get_cpu_vsrh(xth, xT(ctx->opcode));
> -    get_cpu_vsrl(xtl, xT(ctx->opcode));
>      gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
>      EA = tcg_temp_new();
>      gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, EA);
>      tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(xth, EA, ctx->mem_idx, MO_BEQ);
>      tcg_gen_addi_tl(EA, EA, 8);
>      tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(xtl, EA, ctx->mem_idx, MO_BEQ);
> +    set_cpu_vsrh(xT(ctx->opcode), xth);
> +    set_cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode), xtl);
>      tcg_temp_free(EA);
>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xth);
>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xtl);

I've now had a bit of time to look through this and I believe it is correct, so:

Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>


ATB,

Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]