qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pnv: add a physical mapping array de


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pnv: add a physical mapping array describing MMIO ranges in each chip
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 16:05:37 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2

On 05/17/2018 03:53 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Cédric,
> 
> On 05/17/2018 10:18 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> Based on previous work done in skiboot, the physical mapping array
>> helps in calculating the MMIO ranges of each controller depending on
>> the chip id and the chip type. This is will be particularly useful for
>> the P9 models which use less the XSCOM bus and rely more on MMIOs.
>>
>> A link on the chip is now necessary to calculate MMIO BARs and
>> sizes. This is why such a link is introduced in the PSIHB model.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/ppc/pnv.c         | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>  hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c     | 11 +++++++++-
>>  hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c   |  8 ++++----
>>  include/hw/ppc/pnv.h | 58 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 
> I recommend you to use the scripts/git.orderfile to make this review easier.

ok.

> 
>>  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> index 031488131629..330bf6f74810 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> @@ -712,6 +712,16 @@ static uint32_t pnv_chip_core_pir_p9(PnvChip *chip, 
>> uint32_t core_id)
>>   */
>>  #define POWER9_CORE_MASK   (0xffffffffffffffull)
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * POWER8 MMIOs
>> + */
>> +static const PnvPhysMapEntry pnv_chip_power8_phys_map[] = {
>> +    [PNV_MAP_XSCOM]     = { 0x0003fc0000000000ull, 0x0000000800000000ull },
>> +    [PNV_MAP_ICP]       = { 0x0003ffff80000000ull, 0x0000000000100000ull },
>> +    [PNV_MAP_PSIHB]     = { 0x0003fffe80000000ull, 0x0000000000100000ull },
>> +    [PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP] = { 0x0003ffe000000000ull, 0x0000000100000000ull },
>> +};
>> +
>>  static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>  {
>>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>> @@ -721,7 +731,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass 
>> *klass, void *data)
>>      k->chip_cfam_id = 0x221ef04980000000ull;  /* P8 Murano DD2.1 */
>>      k->cores_mask = POWER8E_CORE_MASK;
>>      k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>> -    k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>> +    k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>>      dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8E";
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -734,7 +744,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_class_init(ObjectClass 
>> *klass, void *data)
>>      k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220ea04980000000ull; /* P8 Venice DD2.0 */
>>      k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
>>      k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>> -    k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>> +    k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>>      dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8";
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -747,10 +757,17 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8nvl_class_init(ObjectClass 
>> *klass, void *data)
>>      k->chip_cfam_id = 0x120d304980000000ull;  /* P8 Naples DD1.0 */
>>      k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
>>      k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p8;
>> -    k->xscom_base = 0x003fc0000000000ull;
>> +    k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power8_phys_map;
>>      dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER8NVL";
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * POWER9 MMIOs
>> + */
>> +static const PnvPhysMapEntry pnv_chip_power9_phys_map[] = {
>> +    [PNV_MAP_XSCOM]     = { 0x000603fc00000000ull, 0x0000040000000000ull },
>> +};
>> +
>>  static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>  {
>>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>> @@ -760,7 +777,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass 
>> *klass, void *data)
>>      k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220d104900008000ull; /* P9 Nimbus DD2.0 */
>>      k->cores_mask = POWER9_CORE_MASK;
>>      k->core_pir = pnv_chip_core_pir_p9;
>> -    k->xscom_base = 0x00603fc00000000ull;
>> +    k->phys_map = pnv_chip_power9_phys_map;
>>      dc->desc = "PowerNV Chip POWER9";
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -797,15 +814,14 @@ static void pnv_chip_core_sanitize(PnvChip *chip, 
>> Error **errp)
>>  static void pnv_chip_init(Object *obj)
>>  {
>>      PnvChip *chip = PNV_CHIP(obj);
>> -    PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>> -
>> -    chip->xscom_base = pcc->xscom_base;
>>  
>>      object_initialize(&chip->lpc, sizeof(chip->lpc), TYPE_PNV_LPC);
>>      object_property_add_child(obj, "lpc", OBJECT(&chip->lpc), NULL);
>>  
>>      object_initialize(&chip->psi, sizeof(chip->psi), TYPE_PNV_PSI);
>>      object_property_add_child(obj, "psi", OBJECT(&chip->psi), NULL);
>> +    object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip->psi), "chip", obj,
>> +                                   &error_abort);
>>      object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip->psi), "xics",
>>                                     OBJECT(qdev_get_machine()), 
>> &error_abort);
>>  
>> @@ -829,7 +845,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_icp_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error 
>> **errp)
>>      XICSFabric *xi = XICS_FABRIC(qdev_get_machine());
>>  
>>      name = g_strdup_printf("icp-%x", chip->chip_id);
>> -    memory_region_init(&chip->icp_mmio, OBJECT(chip), name, PNV_ICP_SIZE);
>> +    memory_region_init(&chip->icp_mmio, OBJECT(chip), name, 
>> PNV_ICP_SIZE(chip));
>>      sysbus_init_mmio(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(chip), &chip->icp_mmio);
>>      g_free(name);
>>  
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>> index 5b969127c303..dd7707b971c9 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
>> @@ -465,6 +465,15 @@ static void pnv_psi_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>      Object *obj;
>>      Error *err = NULL;
>>      unsigned int i;
>> +    PnvChip *chip;
>> +
>> +    obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "chip", &err);
>> +    if (!obj) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "%s: required link 'chip' not found: %s",
>> +                   __func__, error_get_pretty(err));
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +    chip = PNV_CHIP(obj);
>>  
>>      obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "xics", &err);
>>      if (!obj) {
>> @@ -497,7 +506,7 @@ static void pnv_psi_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>  
>>      /* Initialize MMIO region */
>>      memory_region_init_io(&psi->regs_mr, OBJECT(dev), &psi_mmio_ops, psi,
>> -                          "psihb", PNV_PSIHB_SIZE);
>> +                          "psihb", PNV_PSIHB_SIZE(chip));
>>  
>>      /* Default BAR for MMIO region */
>>      pnv_psi_set_bar(psi, psi->bar | PSIHB_BAR_EN);
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> index 46fae41f32b0..20ffc233174c 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void xscom_complete(CPUState *cs, uint64_t 
>> hmer_bits)
>>  
>>  static uint32_t pnv_xscom_pcba(PnvChip *chip, uint64_t addr)
>>  {
>> -    addr &= (PNV_XSCOM_SIZE - 1);
>> +    addr &= (PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip) - 1);
>>  
>>      if (pnv_chip_is_power9(chip)) {
>>          return addr >> 3;
>> @@ -179,10 +179,10 @@ void pnv_xscom_realize(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp)
>>  
>>      name = g_strdup_printf("xscom-%x", chip->chip_id);
>>      memory_region_init_io(&chip->xscom_mmio, OBJECT(chip), &pnv_xscom_ops,
>> -                          chip, name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE);
>> +                          chip, name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip));
>>      sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &chip->xscom_mmio);
>>  
>> -    memory_region_init(&chip->xscom, OBJECT(chip), name, PNV_XSCOM_SIZE);
>> +    memory_region_init(&chip->xscom, OBJECT(chip), name, 
>> PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip));
>>      address_space_init(&chip->xscom_as, &chip->xscom, name);
>>      g_free(name);
>>  }
>> @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static const char compat_p9[] = 
>> "ibm,power9-xscom\0ibm,xscom";
>>  int pnv_dt_xscom(PnvChip *chip, void *fdt, int root_offset)
>>  {
>>      uint64_t reg[] = { cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip)),
>> -                       cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_SIZE) };
>> +                       cpu_to_be64(PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip)) };
>>      int xscom_offset;
>>      ForeachPopulateArgs args;
>>      char *name;
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> index 90759240a7b1..b810e7b84ec0 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ typedef struct PnvChip {
>>      uint64_t     cores_mask;
>>      void         *cores;
>>  
>> -    hwaddr       xscom_base;
>>      MemoryRegion xscom_mmio;
>>      MemoryRegion xscom;
>>      AddressSpace xscom_as;
>> @@ -64,6 +63,19 @@ typedef struct PnvChip {
>>      PnvOCC       occ;
>>  } PnvChip;
>>  
>> +typedef enum PnvPhysMapType {
>> +    PNV_MAP_XSCOM,
>> +    PNV_MAP_ICP,
>> +    PNV_MAP_PSIHB,
>> +    PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP,
>> +    PNV_MAP_MAX,
> 
> If you define PNV_MAP_MAX you need to add a check for 'type <
> PNV_MAP_MAX' in pnv_map_size() and pnv_map_base().
> Since you don't use it, it is simpler to just remove it.

Indeed.

>> +} PnvPhysMapType;
>> +
>> +typedef struct PnvPhysMapEntry {
>> +    uint64_t        base;
>> +    uint64_t        size;
>> +} PnvPhysMapEntry;
>> +
>>  typedef struct PnvChipClass {
>>      /*< private >*/
>>      SysBusDeviceClass parent_class;
>> @@ -73,7 +85,7 @@ typedef struct PnvChipClass {
>>      uint64_t     chip_cfam_id;
>>      uint64_t     cores_mask;
>>  
>> -    hwaddr       xscom_base;
>> +    const PnvPhysMapEntry *phys_map;
>>  
>>      uint32_t (*core_pir)(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id);
>>  } PnvChipClass;
>> @@ -159,9 +171,28 @@ void pnv_bmc_powerdown(IPMIBmc *bmc);
>>  /*
>>   * POWER8 MMIO base addresses
>>   */
>> -#define PNV_XSCOM_SIZE        0x800000000ull
>> -#define PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip)                                            \
>> -    (chip->xscom_base + ((uint64_t)(chip)->chip_id) * PNV_XSCOM_SIZE)
>> +static inline uint64_t pnv_map_size(const PnvChip *chip, PnvPhysMapType 
>> type)
>> +{
>> +    PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>> +    const PnvPhysMapEntry *map = &pcc->phys_map[type];
>> +
>> +    return map->size;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline uint64_t pnv_map_base(const PnvChip *chip, PnvPhysMapType 
>> type)
>> +{
>> +    PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
>> +    const PnvPhysMapEntry *map = &pcc->phys_map[type];
>> +
>> +    if (pnv_chip_is_power9(chip)) {
>> +        return map->base + ((uint64_t) chip->chip_id << 42);
>> +    } else  {
>> +        return map->base + chip->chip_id * map->size;
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define PNV_XSCOM_SIZE(chip)         pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_XSCOM)
>> +#define PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip)         pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_XSCOM)
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * XSCOM 0x20109CA defines the ICP BAR:
>> @@ -177,18 +208,13 @@ void pnv_bmc_powerdown(IPMIBmc *bmc);
>>   *      0xffffe02200000000 -> 0x0003ffff80800000
>>   *      0xffffe02600000000 -> 0x0003ffff80900000
>>   */
>> -#define PNV_ICP_SIZE         0x0000000000100000ull
>> -#define PNV_ICP_BASE(chip)                                              \
>> -    (0x0003ffff80000000ull + (uint64_t) PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) * PNV_ICP_SIZE)
>> -
>> +#define PNV_ICP_SIZE(chip)           pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_ICP)
>> +#define PNV_ICP_BASE(chip)           pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_ICP)
>>  
>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_SIZE       0x0000000000100000ull
>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_BASE(chip) \
>> -    (0x0003fffe80000000ull + (uint64_t)PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) * 
>> PNV_PSIHB_SIZE)
>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_SIZE(chip)         pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB)
>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_BASE(chip)         pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB)
>>  
>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE   0x0000000100000000ull
>> -#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_BASE(chip) \
>> -    (0x0003ffe000000000ull + (uint64_t)PNV_CHIP_INDEX(chip) * \
>> -     PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE)
>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_SIZE(chip)     pnv_map_size(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP)
>> +#define PNV_PSIHB_FSP_BASE(chip)     pnv_map_base(chip, PNV_MAP_PSIHB_FSP)
> 
> Those macros are now not very helpful, maybe a following cleanup can
> remove them and use directly pnv_map_base/size() in place.

Yes. They are only here to limit the amount of changes for the moment.
 
>>  
>>  #endif /* _PPC_PNV_H */
>>
> 
> Removing PNV_MAP_MAX:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

Thanks,

C. 

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phil.
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]