qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] qemu: include generated files with <> and not ""


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] qemu: include generated files with <> and not ""
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:05:00 +0200

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 03:54:36AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> QEMU coding style at the moment asks for all non-system
> include files to be used with #include "foo.h".
> However this rule actually does not make sense and
> creates issues for when the included file is generated.
> 
> In C, include "file" means look in current directory,
> then on include search path. Current directory here
> means the source file directory.
> By comparison include <file> means look on include search path.
> 
> As generated files are not in the search directory (unless the build
> directory happens to match the source directory), it does not make sense
> to include them with "" - doing so is merely more work for preprocessor
> and a source or errors if a stale file happens to exist in the source
> directory.
> 
> This changes include directives for all generated files, across the
> tree. The idea is to avoid sending a huge amount of email.  But when
> merging, the changes will be split with one commit per file, e.g. for
> ease of bisect in case of build failures, and to ease merging.
> 
> Note that should some generated files be missed by this tree-wide
> refactoring, it isn't a big deal - this merely maintains the status quo,
> and this can be addressed by a separate patch on top.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>


For the record, the stated advantage is that one can
have a header file that happens to match the system
header.

To put it bluntly that does not work as designed.

For example, if a system header foo.h somewhere has #include <trace.h>
then the compiler will happily pull in our own version (since that is in
the -I path) and completely ignore the system one, breaking things in
the process.

When does it make sense to use include ""? When the header is
a directory-specific one, located with the source.
This approach would both be enforced by the compiler
and help people know where to find the header.

-- 
MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]