qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 4/4] qdev: remove cannot_destroy_with_object_finali


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 4/4] qdev: remove cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 10:37:17 +0200

As all users have been removed, we can remove
cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet field
from the DeviceClass structure.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
---
 include/hw/qdev-core.h | 13 -------------
 qmp.c                  |  5 -----
 2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/qdev-core.h b/include/hw/qdev-core.h
index b44b476..ac682a6 100644
--- a/include/hw/qdev-core.h
+++ b/include/hw/qdev-core.h
@@ -113,19 +113,6 @@ typedef struct DeviceClass {
      * TODO remove once we're there
      */
     bool cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet;
-    /*
-     * Does this device model survive object_unref(object_new(TNAME))?
-     * All device models should, and this flag shouldn't exist.  Some
-     * devices crash in object_new(), some crash or hang in
-     * object_unref().  Makes introspecting properties with
-     * qmp_device_list_properties() dangerous.  Bad, because it's used
-     * by -device FOO,help.  This flag serves to protect that code.
-     * It should never be set without a comment explaining why it is
-     * set.
-     * TODO remove once we're there
-     */
-    bool cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet;
-
     bool hotpluggable;
 
     /* callbacks */
diff --git a/qmp.c b/qmp.c
index a744e44..ab74cd7 100644
--- a/qmp.c
+++ b/qmp.c
@@ -548,11 +548,6 @@ DevicePropertyInfoList *qmp_device_list_properties(const 
char *typename,
         return NULL;
     }
 
-    if (DEVICE_CLASS(klass)->cannot_destroy_with_object_finalize_yet) {
-        error_setg(errp, "Can't list properties of device '%s'", typename);
-        return NULL;
-    }
-
     obj = object_new(typename);
 
     object_property_iter_init(&iter, obj);
-- 
2.9.3




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]