Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 06/11] target/ppc: update overflow flags for add/sub

[Nikunj A Dadhania]

Richard Henderson <address@hidden> writes:

> On 02/22/2017 08:29 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> * SO and OV reflects overflow of the 64-bit result in 64-bit mode and
>>   overflow of the low-order 32-bit result in 32-bit mode
>>
>> * OV32 reflects overflow of the low-order 32-bit independent of the mode
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  target/ppc/translate.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
>> index 184d10f..74185ba 100644
>> --- a/target/ppc/translate.c
>> +++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
>> @@ -809,10 +809,18 @@ static inline void 
>> gen_op_arith_compute_ov(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv arg0,
>>          tcg_gen_andc_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, t0);
>>      }
>>      tcg_temp_free(t0);
>> -    if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
>> -        tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov);
>> +    if (is_isa300(ctx)) {
>> +        tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov32, cpu_ov, 31, 1);
>> +        tcg_gen_extract_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov, 63, 1);
>> +        if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
>> +            tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_ov, cpu_ov32);
>> +        }
>
> Again, you're computing cpu_ov twice.

I lost the corrected code in patch juggling :(

Regards,
Nikunj