[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/...
From: |
Benjamin Herrenschmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Sep 2016 21:08:28 +1000 |
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 12:50 +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> This is a bit broader than Ben's patch which used PPC_SEGMENT_64B.
> it's basically !PPC_64B which includes the e5500.
>
> If so, here is a proposal below adding a new PPC_RFI in the
> "PowerPC Instructions types definitions" enum for that purpose.
> Not much bits left there.
Why not stick to PPC_SEGMENT_64B ?
rfi exists on all 32-bit processors and all non-Book3S (aka server aka
segment/hash) 64-bit. So PPC_SEGMENT_64B is the test we want.
IE. rfi does exist on e5500
Cheers,
Ben.
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Thomas Huth, 2016/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2016/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, David Gibson, 2016/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2016/09/06
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <=
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, 2016/09/07
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] ppc: Fix rfi/rfid/hrfi/... emulation, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/09/08