[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 05/10] ppc: Fix generation if ISI/DSI vs. HV mode
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 05/10] ppc: Fix generation if ISI/DSI vs. HV mode |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:42:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.8.0 |
On 06/14/2016 08:34 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:24:51AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>
>> Under some circumstances, we need to direct ISI and DSI interrupts
>> at the hypervisor, turning them into HISI/HDSI, and using different
>> SPRs (HDSISR and HDAR) depending on the combination of MSR_DR and
>> the corresponding VPM bits in LPCR.
>>
>> This moves part of the code into helpers that are fixed to select
>> the right exception type and registers. On pre-P7 processors, LPCR
>> is 0 which provides the old behaviour of directing the interrupts
>> at the supervisor.
>>
>> Thanks to Andrei Warkentin for finding a bug when HV=1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c | 69
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
>> index 668da5e22653..072a952c8bd5 100644
>> --- a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
>> +++ b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
>> @@ -613,6 +613,47 @@ unsigned ppc_hash64_hpte_page_shift_noslb(PowerPCCPU
>> *cpu,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void ppc_hash64_set_isi(CPUState *cs, CPUPPCState *env,
>> + uint64_t error_code)
>> +{
>> + bool vpm;
>> +
>> + if (msr_ir) {
>> + vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM1);
>> + } else {
>> + vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
>> + }
>> + if (vpm && !msr_hv) {
>> + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_HISI;
>
> In the ISI case, you use HISI if !msr_hv..
>
>> + } else {
>> + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
>> + }
>> + env->error_code = error_code;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void ppc_hash64_set_dsi(CPUState *cs, CPUPPCState *env, uint64_t dar,
>> + uint64_t dsisr)
>> +{
>> + bool vpm;
>> +
>> + if (msr_dr) {
>> + vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM1);
>> + } else {
>> + vpm = !!(env->spr[SPR_LPCR] & LPCR_VPM0);
>> + }
>> + if (vpm && msr_hv) {
>> + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_HDSI;
>
> ..but in the DSI case you use HDSI if msr_hv. Is that really right?
No. I forgot to add this patch from Andrei :
https://github.com/legoater/qemu/commit/e218fd3ba945bb0f483f5f12bedbb74d897cd5b9
I will send it as a fix.
C.
>> + env->spr[SPR_HDAR] = dar;
>> + env->spr[SPR_HDSISR] = dsisr;
>> + } else {
>> + cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
>> + env->spr[SPR_DAR] = dar;
>> + env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = dsisr;
>> + }
>> + env->error_code = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
>> int rwx, int mmu_idx)
>> {
>> @@ -623,7 +664,7 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
>> eaddr,
>> hwaddr pte_offset;
>> ppc_hash_pte64_t pte;
>> int pp_prot, amr_prot, prot;
>> - uint64_t new_pte1;
>> + uint64_t new_pte1, dsisr;
>> const int need_prot[] = {PAGE_READ, PAGE_WRITE, PAGE_EXEC};
>> hwaddr raddr;
>>
>> @@ -657,26 +698,21 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
>> eaddr,
>>
>> /* 3. Check for segment level no-execute violation */
>> if ((rwx == 2) && (slb->vsid & SLB_VSID_N)) {
>> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
>> - env->error_code = 0x10000000;
>> + ppc_hash64_set_isi(cs, env, 0x10000000);
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> /* 4. Locate the PTE in the hash table */
>> pte_offset = ppc_hash64_htab_lookup(cpu, slb, eaddr, &pte);
>> if (pte_offset == -1) {
>> + dsisr = 0x40000000;
>> if (rwx == 2) {
>> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
>> - env->error_code = 0x40000000;
>> + ppc_hash64_set_isi(cs, env, dsisr);
>> } else {
>> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
>> - env->error_code = 0;
>> - env->spr[SPR_DAR] = eaddr;
>> if (rwx == 1) {
>> - env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = 0x42000000;
>> - } else {
>> - env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = 0x40000000;
>> + dsisr |= 0x02000000;
>> }
>> + ppc_hash64_set_dsi(cs, env, eaddr, dsisr);
>> }
>> return 1;
>> }
>> @@ -705,14 +741,9 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
>> eaddr,
>> /* Access right violation */
>> qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "PTE access rejected\n");
>> if (rwx == 2) {
>> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
>> - env->error_code = 0x08000000;
>> + ppc_hash64_set_isi(cs, env, 0x08000000);
>> } else {
>> - target_ulong dsisr = 0;
>> -
>> - cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
>> - env->error_code = 0;
>> - env->spr[SPR_DAR] = eaddr;
>> + dsisr = 0;
>> if (need_prot[rwx] & ~pp_prot) {
>> dsisr |= 0x08000000;
>> }
>> @@ -722,7 +753,7 @@ int ppc_hash64_handle_mmu_fault(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr
>> eaddr,
>> if (need_prot[rwx] & ~amr_prot) {
>> dsisr |= 0x00200000;
>> }
>> - env->spr[SPR_DSISR] = dsisr;
>> + ppc_hash64_set_dsi(cs, env, eaddr, dsisr);
>> }
>> return 1;
>> }
>
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 02/10] ppc: Create cpu_ppc_set_papr() helper (for LPCR), (continued)
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 03/10] ppc: Rework POWER7 & POWER8 exception model (part 2), Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 04/10] ppc: Fix POWER7 and POWER8 exception definitions, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 05/10] ppc: Fix generation if ISI/DSI vs. HV mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 06/10] ppc: Rework generation of priv and inval interrupts, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 07/10] ppc: Add real mode CI load/store instructions for P7 and P8, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 08/10] ppc: Turn a bunch of booleans from int to bool, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 09/10] ppc: Move exception generation code out of line, Cédric Le Goater, 2016/06/13