qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creati


From: Greg Kurz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v3] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:53:29 +0200

On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:27:06 +0200
Radim Krčmář <address@hidden> wrote:

> 2016-04-20 18:09+0100, James Hogan:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:02:10PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote:  
> >> 2016-04-20 17:44+0200, Greg Kurz:  
> >> > diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
> >> > index 70ef1a43c114..0278ea146db5 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
> >> > +++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
> >> > @@ -248,9 +248,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm 
> >> > *kvm, unsigned int id)
> >> >          int err, size, offset;
> >> >          void *gebase;
> >> >          int i;
> >> > +        struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> >> >  
> >> > -        struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), 
> >> > GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > +        if (id >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS) {
> >> > +                err = -EINVAL;
> >> > +                goto out;  
> >> 
> >> 'vcpu' looks undefined at this point, so kfree in 'out:' may bug.  
> > 
> > Thats out_free_cpu I think?  
> 
> My bad, it is.  Thank you!
> 

I kept the goto based construct because it was done this way for kzalloc().
but I agree that 'return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)' may look more explicit.

Worth a v4 ?

Cheers.

--
Greg




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]