qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 6/9] pseries: Clean up error handling in spapr_r


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCHv3 6/9] pseries: Clean up error handling in spapr_rtas_register()
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:23:08 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:20:24AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 18.01.2016 05:24, David Gibson wrote:
> > The errors detected in this function necessarily indicate bugs in the rest
> > of the qemu code, rather than an external or configuration problem.
> > 
> > So, a simple assert() is more appropriate than any more complex error
> > reporting.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 12 +++---------
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > index 34b12a3..0be52ae 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> > @@ -648,17 +648,11 @@ target_ulong spapr_rtas_call(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
> > sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >  
> >  void spapr_rtas_register(int token, const char *name, spapr_rtas_fn fn)
> >  {
> > -    if (!((token >= RTAS_TOKEN_BASE) && (token < RTAS_TOKEN_MAX))) {
> > -        fprintf(stderr, "RTAS invalid token 0x%x\n", token);
> > -        exit(1);
> > -    }
> > +    assert((token >= RTAS_TOKEN_BASE) && (token < RTAS_TOKEN_MAX));
> 
> While you're at it, you could also get rid of some superfluous
> parentheses in that statement:
> 
>       assert(token >= RTAS_TOKEN_BASE && token < RTAS_TOKEN_MAX);

I could, but I won't because I think it's clearer as it is.

> >      token -= RTAS_TOKEN_BASE;
> > -    if (rtas_table[token].name) {
> > -        fprintf(stderr, "RTAS call \"%s\" is registered already as 0x%x\n",
> > -                rtas_table[token].name, token);
> > -        exit(1);
> > -    }
> > +
> > +    assert(!rtas_table[token].name);
> >  
> >      rtas_table[token].name = name;
> >      rtas_table[token].fn = fn;
> > 
> 
> Anyway, patch sounds reasonable,
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]