[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 for-2.3 01/25] acpi: fix aml_equal
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 for-2.3 01/25] acpi: fix aml_equal term implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:04:51 +0100 |
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:28:22AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 13:16:03 +0200
> Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > The DefLEqual op does not have a target operand. Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
>
> > ---
> > hw/acpi/aml-build.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > index 876cada..0d14561 100644
> > --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> > @@ -542,7 +542,6 @@ Aml *aml_equal(Aml *arg1, Aml *arg2)
> > Aml *var = aml_opcode(0x93 /* LequalOp */);
> > aml_append(var, arg1);
> > aml_append(var, arg2);
> > - build_append_int(var->buf, 0x00); /* NullNameOp */
> It's just happens to work in case CPU and PCI hotplug because
> it LEqual was the only predicate in if block and NullNameOp
> was considered as part of inner code-block, like:
> if (LEqual(a, b)) {
> NullName; // nop
> ...
> }
So - maybe aml_if should get 3rd parameter - the command?
> > return var;
> > }
> >
[Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 for-2.3 02/25] acpi: add aml_or() term, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2015/03/08
[Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 for-2.3 03/25] acpi: add aml_add() term, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2015/03/08
[Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 for-2.3 04/25] acpi: add aml_lless() term, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2015/03/08
[Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 for-2.3 05/25] acpi: add aml_index() term, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2015/03/08