qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] target-ppc: kvm: Fix memory overfl


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] target-ppc: kvm: Fix memory overflow issue about strncat()
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:05:12 +0200



> Am 24.10.2014 um 09:49 schrieb Michael Tokarev <address@hidden>:
> 
>> On 10/13/2014 06:47 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 13.10.14 16:36, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> strncat() will append additional '\0' to destination buffer, so need
>>> additional 1 byte for it, or may cause memory overflow, just like other
>>> area within QEMU have done.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <address@hidden>
>> 
>> I agree with this patch. However, the code is pretty ugly - I'm sure it
>> must've been me who wrote it :).
>> 
>> Could you please instead rewrite it to use g_strdup_printf() rather than
>> strncat()s? That way we resolve all string pitfalls automatically - and
>> this code is not the fast path, so doing an extra memory allocation is ok.
> 
> I'd just use snprintf() like this:
> 
> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> index 9c23c6b..5eaa36c 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -1794,8 +1794,7 @@ static uint64_t kvmppc_read_int_cpu_dt(const char 
> *propname)
>         return -1;
>     }
> 
> -    strncat(buf, "/", sizeof(buf) - strlen(buf));
> -    strncat(buf, propname, sizeof(buf) - strlen(buf));
> +    snprintf(buf + strlen(buf), sizeof(buf) - strlen(buf), "/%s", propname);
> 
>     f = fopen(buf, "rb");
>     if (!f) {
> 
> the buffer is of size PATH_MAX, and we're looking at /proc filesystem where
> names should be rather short so we're extremly unlikely to hit this prob in
> practice, there's no need to dynamically allocate a buffer for this stuff.

I've already applied the fix to ppc-next.

> 
> (Or alternatively there's asprintf(), but still I think it is overkill).

That one isn't portable iirc.

> 
> I can apply the above if everyone agrees.

No worries, it's all over already ;).

Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]