qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 08/13] spapr_pci: Enable DDW


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC PATCH v2 08/13] spapr_pci: Enable DDW
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:14:31 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:12:30PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> This implements DDW for emulated PHB.
> 
> This advertises DDW in device tree.
> 
> Since QEMU does not implement any 64bit DMA capable device, this hack
> has been used to enable 64bit DMA on E1000:
> 
> diff --git a/hw/net/e1000.c b/hw/net/e1000.c
> index 0fc29a0..131f80a 100644
> --- a/hw/net/e1000.c
> +++ b/hw/net/e1000.c
> @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ static const uint32_t mac_reg_init[] = {
>      [STATUS] =  0x80000000 | E1000_STATUS_GIO_MASTER_ENABLE |
>                  E1000_STATUS_ASDV | E1000_STATUS_MTXCKOK |
>                  E1000_STATUS_SPEED_1000 | E1000_STATUS_FD |
> +                E1000_STATUS_PCIX_MODE |
>                  E1000_STATUS_LU,
>      [MANC] =    E1000_MANC_EN_MNG2HOST | E1000_MANC_RCV_TCO_EN |
>                  E1000_MANC_ARP_EN | E1000_MANC_0298_EN |

Are you planning to send a patch to enable 64-bit DMA in the e1000
device properly?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> ---
> Changes:
> v2:
> * tested on hacked emulated E1000
> * implemented DDW reset on the PHB reset
> * spapr_pci_ddw_remove/spapr_pci_ddw_reset are public for reuse by VFIO
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c          | 96 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h |  7 ++++
>  2 files changed, 103 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> index 9b03d0d..cba8d9d 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>   * OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
>   * THE SOFTWARE.
>   */
> +#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>  #include "hw/hw.h"
>  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
>  #include "hw/pci/msi.h"
> @@ -498,6 +499,70 @@ void spapr_pci_msi_init(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, hwaddr 
> addr)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * Dynamic DMA windows
> + */
> +static int spapr_pci_ddw_query(sPAPRPHBState *sphb,
> +                               uint32_t *windows_available,
> +                               uint32_t *page_size_mask)
> +{
> +    *windows_available = 1;
> +    *page_size_mask = DDW_PGSIZE_16M;
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int spapr_pci_ddw_create(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, uint32_t page_shift,
> +                                uint32_t window_shift, uint32_t liobn,
> +                                sPAPRTCETable **ptcet)
> +{
> +    *ptcet = spapr_tce_new_table(DEVICE(sphb), liobn,
> +                                 SPAPR_PCI_TCE64_START, page_shift,
> +                                 1ULL << (window_shift - page_shift),
> +                                 true);

Does anything actually validate that the specified page_shift is one
of the permitted/advertised ones?

> +    if (!*ptcet) {
> +        return -1;
> +    }
> +    memory_region_add_subregion(&sphb->iommu_root, (*ptcet)->bus_offset,
> +                                spapr_tce_get_iommu(*ptcet));
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int spapr_pci_ddw_remove(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, sPAPRTCETable *tcet)
> +{
> +    memory_region_del_subregion(&sphb->iommu_root,
> +                                spapr_tce_get_iommu(tcet));
> +    spapr_tce_free_table(tcet);

Ok, relating to my comment in the previous patch, ddw_num doesn't seem
to be decremented here either.

> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int spapr_pci_remove_ddw_cb(Object *child, void *opaque)
> +{
> +    sPAPRTCETable *tcet;
> +
> +    tcet = (sPAPRTCETable *) object_dynamic_cast(child, 
> TYPE_SPAPR_TCE_TABLE);
> +
> +    /* Delete all dynamic windows, i.e. every except the default one with #0 
> */
> +    if (tcet && SPAPR_PCI_DMA_WINDOW_NUM(tcet->liobn)) {
> +        sPAPRPHBState *sphb = opaque;
> +        sPAPRPHBClass *spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(sphb);
> +
> +        spc->ddw_remove(sphb, tcet);
> +    }
> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int spapr_pci_ddw_reset(sPAPRPHBState *sphb)
> +{
> +    object_child_foreach(OBJECT(sphb), spapr_pci_remove_ddw_cb, sphb);
> +    sphb->ddw_num = 0;

So, you do reset ddw_num here, but since it is incremented in the
generic RTAS code, this smells like a layering violation.

> +
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * PHB PCI device
>   */
>  static AddressSpace *spapr_pci_dma_iommu(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int 
> devfn)
> @@ -671,6 +736,12 @@ static int spapr_phb_children_reset(Object *child, void 
> *opaque)
>  
>  static void spapr_phb_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
>  {
> +    sPAPRPHBClass *spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(qdev);
> +
> +    if (spc->ddw_reset) {
> +        spc->ddw_reset(SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(qdev));
> +    }
> +
>      /* Reset the IOMMU state */
>      object_child_foreach(OBJECT(qdev), spapr_phb_children_reset, NULL);
>  }
> @@ -685,6 +756,7 @@ static Property spapr_phb_properties[] = {
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("io_win_addr", sPAPRPHBState, io_win_addr, -1),
>      DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("io_win_size", sPAPRPHBState, io_win_size,
>                         SPAPR_PCI_IO_WIN_SIZE),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("ddw", sPAPRPHBState, ddw_enabled, false),
>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>  };
>  
> @@ -802,6 +874,10 @@ static void spapr_phb_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, 
> void *data)
>      set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories);
>      dc->cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet = false;
>      spc->finish_realize = spapr_phb_finish_realize;
> +    spc->ddw_query = spapr_pci_ddw_query;
> +    spc->ddw_create = spapr_pci_ddw_create;
> +    spc->ddw_remove = spapr_pci_ddw_remove;
> +    spc->ddw_reset = spapr_pci_ddw_reset;
>  }
>  
>  static const TypeInfo spapr_phb_info = {
> @@ -885,6 +961,13 @@ int spapr_populate_pci_dt(sPAPRPHBState *phb,
>      uint32_t interrupt_map_mask[] = {
>          cpu_to_be32(b_ddddd(-1)|b_fff(0)), 0x0, 0x0, cpu_to_be32(-1)};
>      uint32_t interrupt_map[PCI_SLOT_MAX * PCI_NUM_PINS][7];
> +    uint32_t ddw_applicable[] = {
> +        RTAS_IBM_QUERY_PE_DMA_WINDOW,
> +        RTAS_IBM_CREATE_PE_DMA_WINDOW,
> +        RTAS_IBM_REMOVE_PE_DMA_WINDOW
> +    };
> +    uint32_t ddw_extensions[] = { 1, RTAS_IBM_RESET_PE_DMA_WINDOW };
> +    sPAPRPHBClass *spc = SPAPR_PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_GET_CLASS(phb);
>  
>      /* Start populating the FDT */
>      sprintf(nodename, "address@hidden" PRIx64, phb->buid);
> @@ -914,6 +997,19 @@ int spapr_populate_pci_dt(sPAPRPHBState *phb,
>      _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, bus_off, "ibm,pci-config-space-type", 0x1));
>      _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, bus_off, "ibm,pe-total-#msi", XICS_IRQS));
>  
> +    /* Dynamic DMA window */
> +    if (phb->ddw_enabled &&
> +        spc->ddw_query && spc->ddw_create && spc->ddw_remove) {
> +        _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, bus_off, "ibm,ddw-applicable", &ddw_applicable,
> +                         sizeof(ddw_applicable)));
> +
> +        if (spc->ddw_reset) {
> +            /* When enabled, the guest will remove the default 32bit window 
> */

I guess it's not really relevant here, but the reason for availability
of reset causing the guest to remove the default window seems unclear.

> +            _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, bus_off, "ibm,ddw-extensions",
> +                             &ddw_extensions, sizeof(ddw_extensions)));
> +        }
> +    }
> +
>      /* Build the interrupt-map, this must matches what is done
>       * in pci_spapr_map_irq
>       */
> diff --git a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
> index a1fdbb2..0b40fcf 100644
> --- a/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci-host/spapr.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ struct sPAPRPHBState {
>      int32_t msi_devs_num;
>      spapr_pci_msi_mig *msi_devs;
>  
> +    bool ddw_enabled;
> +
>      QLIST_ENTRY(sPAPRPHBState) list;
>  };
>  
> @@ -126,6 +128,9 @@ struct sPAPRPHBVFIOState {
>  
>  #define SPAPR_PCI_MEM_WIN_BUS_OFFSET 0x80000000ULL
>  
> +/* Default 64bit dynamic window offset */
> +#define SPAPR_PCI_TCE64_START        0x8000000000000000ULL
> +
>  static inline qemu_irq spapr_phb_lsi_qirq(struct sPAPRPHBState *phb, int pin)
>  {
>      return xics_get_qirq(spapr->icp, phb->lsi_table[pin].irq);
> @@ -144,5 +149,7 @@ void spapr_pci_rtas_init(void);
>  sPAPRPHBState *spapr_pci_find_phb(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, uint64_t buid);
>  PCIDevice *spapr_pci_find_dev(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, uint64_t buid,
>                                uint32_t config_addr);
> +int spapr_pci_ddw_remove(sPAPRPHBState *sphb, sPAPRTCETable *tcet);
> +int spapr_pci_ddw_reset(sPAPRPHBState *sphb);
>  
>  #endif /* __HW_SPAPR_PCI_H__ */

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: pgpi1rc3oAGLa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]