qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] VSX Stage 4


From: Tom Musta
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/14] VSX Stage 4
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 08:53:39 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0

On 11/7/2013 6:23 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 06:31 AM, Tom Musta wrote:
>> The single-precision scalar arithmetic instructions all interpret the most
>> significant 64 bits of a VSR as a single precision floating point number
>> stored in double precision format (similar to the standard PowerPC floating
>> point single precision instructions).  Thus a common theme in the supporting
>> code is rounding of an intermediate double-precision number to single 
>> precision.
> 
> Modulo my comments wrt the actual computation of fma, the patches all look 
> fine.
> 
> But I'd like to also mention a pre-existing flaw/niggle in the ppc port.
> 
> The conversions to/from in-register representation for the single-precision
> values should never raise exceptions.  Yet we always use
> 
>     d.d = float32_to_float64(f.f, &env->fp_status);
>     f.f = float64_to_float32(d.d, &env->fp_status);
> 
> The use of env->fp_status is either wrong or extremely misleading.  It sure
> looks like the operation affects global cpu state.  It may be that that state
> is never copied back to the "real" fpscr and so doesn't actually affect cpu
> state, but how can I see that for sure?
> 
> I think it would be better to implement ConvertSPtoDP_NP and ConvertSP64toSP
> exactly as written in the spec.
> 
> Or at minimum use a dummy fp_status that's not associated with env.  It should
> not matter what the "real" rounding mode is in either case, since values that
> are not exactly representable as single-precision values give undefined 
> results.

Richard:

Thanks for your comments.  I concur with this comment on fp_status.

I am looking into the comments on fused multiply-add.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]