qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 20/23] s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR FP TEST DA


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 20/23] s390x/tcg: Implement VECTOR FP TEST DATA CLASS IMMEDIATE
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 19:40:41 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

On 31.05.19 12:44, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We can reuse float64_dcmask().
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/s390x/helper.h           |  2 ++
>  target/s390x/insn-data.def      |  2 ++
>  target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++
>  target/s390x/vec_fpu_helper.c   | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/helper.h b/target/s390x/helper.h
> index c788fc1b7f..e9aff83b05 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/helper.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/helper.h
> @@ -292,6 +292,8 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(gvec_vfsq64, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, 
> ptr, cptr, env, i32)
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(gvec_vfsq64s, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, ptr, cptr, env, i32)
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(gvec_vfs64, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, ptr, cptr, cptr, env, 
> i32)
>  DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_5(gvec_vfs64s, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, ptr, cptr, cptr, env, 
> i32)
> +DEF_HELPER_4(gvec_vftci64, void, ptr, cptr, env, i32)
> +DEF_HELPER_4(gvec_vftci64s, void, ptr, cptr, env, i32)
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  DEF_HELPER_3(servc, i32, env, i64, i64)
> diff --git a/target/s390x/insn-data.def b/target/s390x/insn-data.def
> index 4426f40250..f421184fcd 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/insn-data.def
> +++ b/target/s390x/insn-data.def
> @@ -1246,6 +1246,8 @@
>      F(0xe7ce, VFSQ,    VRR_a, V,   0, 0, 0, 0, vfsq, 0, IF_VEC)
>  /* VECTOR FP SUBTRACT */
>      F(0xe7e2, VFS,     VRR_c, V,   0, 0, 0, 0, vfa, 0, IF_VEC)
> +/* VECTOR FP TEST DATA CLASS IMMEDIATE */
> +    F(0xe74a, VFTCI,   VRI_e, V,   0, 0, 0, 0, vftci, 0, IF_VEC)
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>  /* COMPARE AND SWAP AND PURGE */
> diff --git a/target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c b/target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c
> index bc75a147b6..715fcb2cb5 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c
> @@ -2791,3 +2791,24 @@ static DisasJumpType op_vfsq(DisasContext *s, DisasOps 
> *o)
>                     0, fn);
>      return DISAS_NEXT;
>  }
> +
> +static DisasJumpType op_vftci(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
> +{
> +    const uint16_t i3 = get_field(s->fields, i3);
> +    const uint8_t fpf = get_field(s->fields, m4);
> +    const uint8_t m5 = get_field(s->fields, m5);
> +    gen_helper_gvec_2_ptr *fn = gen_helper_gvec_vftci64;
> +
> +    if (fpf != FPF_LONG || extract32(m5, 0, 3)) {
> +        gen_program_exception(s, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
> +        return DISAS_NORETURN;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (extract32(m5, 3, 1)) {
> +        fn = gen_helper_gvec_vftci64s;
> +    }
> +    gen_gvec_2_ptr(get_field(s->fields, v1), get_field(s->fields, v2), 
> cpu_env,
> +                   i3, fn);
> +    set_cc_static(s);
> +    return DISAS_NEXT;
> +}
> diff --git a/target/s390x/vec_fpu_helper.c b/target/s390x/vec_fpu_helper.c
> index 10249c5105..930b6d1db4 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/vec_fpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/vec_fpu_helper.c
> @@ -603,3 +603,42 @@ void HELPER(gvec_vfs64s)(void *v1, const void *v2, const 
> void *v3,
>  {
>      vop64_3(v1, v2, v3, env, true, vfs64, GETPC());
>  }
> +
> +static int vftci64(S390Vector *v1, const S390Vector *v2, CPUS390XState *env,
> +                   bool s, uint16_t i3)
> +{
> +    int i, match = 0;
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> +        float64 a = make_float64(s390_vec_read_element64(v2, i));
> +
> +        if (float64_dcmask(env, a) & i3) {
> +            match++;
> +            s390_vec_write_element64(v1, i, -1ull);
> +        } else {
> +            s390_vec_write_element64(v1, i, 0);
> +        }
> +        if (s) {
> +            break;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    if (match == i + 1) {
> +        return 0;
> +    } else if (match) {
> +        return 1;
> +    }

This is also wrong, similar to the other function.


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]