qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] docker: update fedora to f30


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] docker: update fedora to f30
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 10:51:48 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.3.2; emacs 26.1

Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 9:41 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/24/19 1:40 AM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> > Released last month.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> >  tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker 
>> > b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
>> > index 69d4a7f5d7..1496b68ba1 100644
>> > --- a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
>> > +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker
>> > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> > -FROM fedora:29
>> > +FROM fedora:30
>>
>> Hmm this patch is pending for review:
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg00819.html
>
> Oh I missed that. Maybe we should use "latest" to avoid bumping the
> version every 6 months.
>
> fwiw we have different versions:
>
> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-cris-cross.docker:FROM fedora:latest

I'll fix that

> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora-i386-cross.docker:FROM fedora:29

The cross compilers images are different as they generally don't want to
include the "native" libraries. For Debian based ones we do have a base
image that everything builds up from but we haven't bothered for fedora
as we only have a few so far.

> tests/docker/dockerfiles/fedora.docker:FROM fedora:29
>
> In 62559b916 "tests: update Fedora i386 cross image to Fedora 29", Daniel 
> said:
>
>     Using the "latest" tag is not a good idea because this changes what
>     release it points to every 6 months. Together with caching of docker
>     builds this can cause confusion where CI has cached & built with Fedora
>     N, while a developer tries to reproduce a CI problem with Fedora N + 1,
>     or vica-verca.
>
> But at the same time, Daniel bumped f28 to f29 in commit 19a9978db1.
>
> It's confusing, do we need some stability or follow the latest?
>
>>
>> >  ENV PACKAGES \
>> >      bc \
>> >      bison \
>> >


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]