Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/9] qapi/block-core: add option for io_uring

[Eric Blake]

On 5/21/19 6:52 PM, Aarushi Mehta wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Aarushi Mehta <address@hidden>

Sparse on the details. The subject line says what, but without a 'why'
for how io_uring is different from existing aio options, it's hard to
see why I'd want to use it. Do you have any benchmark numbers?

> ---
>  qapi/block-core.json | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json
> index 7ccbfff9d0..116995810a 100644
> --- a/qapi/block-core.json
> +++ b/qapi/block-core.json
> @@ -2776,11 +2776,12 @@
>  #
>  # @threads:     Use qemu's thread pool
>  # @native:      Use native AIO backend (only Linux and Windows)
> +# @io_uring:    Use linux io_uring

Missing a '(since 4.1)' tag.

>  #
>  # Since: 2.9
>  ##
>  { 'enum': 'BlockdevAioOptions',
> -  'data': [ 'threads', 'native' ] }
> +  'data': [ 'threads', 'native','io_uring' ] }

Missing space after ',' (not essential, but matching style is nice).
Should the new element be defined conditionally, so that introspection
only sees the new enum member when compiled for Linux?



-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature