qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt patch] qemu: adds support for virtfs 9p argume


From: Christian Schoenebeck
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt patch] qemu: adds support for virtfs 9p argument 'vii'
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 10:40:48 +0200

On Dienstag, 7. Mai 2019 18:16:08 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Here are the archive links for latest v3 patch set [5(+1) patches total]:
> 
> [PATCH v3 0/5] 9p: Fix file ID collisions:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg01143.html
> 
> [PATCH v3 1/5] 9p: mitigates most QID path collisions:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg01142.html
> 
> [PATCH v3 2/5] 9P: trivial cleanup of QID path collision mitigation:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg01140.html
> 
> [PATCH v3 3/5] 9p: persistency of QID path beyond reboots / suspensions:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg01144.html
> 
> [PATCH v3 4/5] 9p: use variable length suffixes for inode mapping:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg01141.html
> 
> [PATCH v3 5/5] 9p: adds virtfs 'vii' device parameter
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg01138.html
> 
> And the optional libvirt patch:
> 
> [libvirt patch] qemu: adds support for virtfs 9p argument 'vii':
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg01223.html
> 
> > > Please just have a glimpse on that v3 thread, and before I address the
> > > details that you requested (I have reviewed them all already and will
> > > address them), I would like you to ask you for a coarse feedback on
> > > design/features first.
> > 
> > > Because there are some things where I am unresolved on design level yet:
> > 
> > I'll try but probably not before next week.

Hi Greg, you have not forgotten about me, did you? ;-)

Or should I go ahead and provide a v4 next week addressing the issues 
discussed so far?

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]