[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nbd/server: Nicer spelling of max BLOCK_STATUS
|
From: |
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nbd/server: Nicer spelling of max BLOCK_STATUS reply length |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2019 10:03:29 +0000 |
10.05.2019 18:17, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 3d068aff (3.0) introduced NBD_MAX_BITMAP_EXTENTS as a limit on
> how large we would allow a reply to NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS to grow when
> it is visiting a qemu:dirty-bitmap: context. Later, commit fb7afc79
> (3.1) reused the constant to limit base:allocation context replies,
> although the name is now less appropriate in that situation.
>
> Rename things, and improve the macro to use units.h for better
> legibility. Then reformat the comment to comply with checkpatch rules
> added in the meantime. No semantic change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
With or without Stefano's suggestion:
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir