qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/mips: Fix minor bug in FPU


From: Aleksandar Markovic
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/mips: Fix minor bug in FPU
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:26:03 +0000

> From: Mateja Marjanovic <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/mips: Fix minor bug in FPU
> 
> 
> On 18.3.19. 20:08, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> >> From: Mateja Marjanovic <address@hidden>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] target/mips: Fix minor bug in FPU
> >>
> >> From: Mateja Marjanovic <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> Wrong type of NaN was generated for IEEE754-2008 by maddf and
> >> msubf insturctions when the arguments were inf, zero, nan or
> >> zero, inf, nan respectively.
> >>
> > "insturctions" -> "instructions".
> Typo, I will correct that.
> >
> > The word "respectively" is here wrong and spurious.
> >
> > The meaning that you convey with the current wording is that
> > the "inf, zero, nan" case is related to "maddf" (only), and the
> > "zero, inf, nan" to "msubf".
> Could you tell me what do you suggest?
> 
> Does "Wrong type of NaN was generated for IEEE754-2008 by maddf and msubf
> 
> insturctions when the arguments were (inf, zero, nan) or
> 
> (zero, inf, nan)." seem ok?

I'm afraid it doesn't, it contains several errors that I already
objected to. I suggest that you read the comments thoroughly.

Aleksandar

> 
> >
> > Please use full instruction names with possible Backus-Naur
> > shorthands, like "MADDF.<D|S>", "MSUBF.<D|S>".
> Ok, I will use that from now on.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aleksandar
> Thanks,
> Mateja
> 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]