qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 9/9] target/arm: Simplify BFXIL expan


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 9/9] target/arm: Simplify BFXIL expansion
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 01:45:34 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1

On 3/7/19 3:41 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> The mask implied by the extract is redundant with the one
> implied by the deposit.  Also, fix spelling of BFXIL.

This spelling fix also help understanding the context!

> 
> Cc: address@hidden 
> Cc: Peter Maydell <address@hidden> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/arm/translate-a64.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> index 54fe94c436..39e0512d21 100644
> --- a/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> @@ -4043,8 +4043,8 @@ static void disas_bitfield(DisasContext *s, uint32_t 
> insn)
>              tcg_gen_extract_i64(tcg_rd, tcg_tmp, ri, len);
>              return;
>          }
> -        /* opc == 1, BXFIL fall through to deposit */
> -        tcg_gen_extract_i64(tcg_tmp, tcg_tmp, ri, len);
> +        /* opc == 1, BFXIL fall through to deposit */
> +        tcg_gen_shri_i64(tcg_tmp, tcg_tmp, ri);
>          pos = 0;
>      } else {
>          /* Handle the ri > si case with a deposit
> @@ -4062,7 +4062,7 @@ static void disas_bitfield(DisasContext *s, uint32_t 
> insn)
>          len = ri;
>      }
>  
> -    if (opc == 1) { /* BFM, BXFIL */
> +    if (opc == 1) { /* BFM, BFXIL */
>          tcg_gen_deposit_i64(tcg_rd, tcg_rd, tcg_tmp, pos, len);

Fall through and use deposit of len indeed. So the previous SHRI is enough.

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>

This function uses hardcore optimizations btw, un chef d'oeuvre :)

>      } else {
>          /* SBFM or UBFM: We start with zero, and we haven't modified
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]