Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] hw/i386: update copyright notice

[David Kiarie]

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:27 PM David Kiarie <address@hidden> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:23 PM Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 04/03/2019 16.13, David Kiarie wrote:
>> >
>> >                             Hi David,
>> >
>> >                             On 2/23/19 11:54 AM, David Kiarie wrote:
>> >                             > Signed-off-by: David Kiarie
>> >                             <address@hidden
>> >                             <mailto:address@hidden>>
>> >                             > ---
>> >                             >  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 2 +-
>> >                             >  hw/i386/amd_iommu.h | 2 +-
>> >                             >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
>> >                             deletions(-)
>> >                             >
>> >                             > diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> >                             b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> >                             > index 8ad707a..4f179da 100644
>> >                             > --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> >                             > +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>> >                             > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>> >                             >   * QEMU emulation of AMD IOMMU (AMD-Vi)
>> >                             >   *
>> >                             >   * Copyright (C) 2011 Eduard - Gabriel
>> >                             Munteanu
>> >                             > - * Copyright (C) 2015 David Kiarie,
>> >                             <address@hidden
>> >                             <mailto:address@hidden>>
>> >                             > + * Copyright (C) 2016 David Kiarie
>> Kahurani
>> >
>> >                             Why do you change the year? Because your
>> >                             work was merged in 2016?
>> >
>> >
>> >                         no.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                     though, if you have a legitimate issue with the
>> >                     change, you can always air it.
>> >
>> >
>> >                 you might think random emails are weird but Paolo, i
>> >                 don't expect to see any activity from you, on Qemu repo
>> >                 before this issue is sorted ;-)
>> >
>> >
>> >             i mostly don't care about this code but i *wrote* it. if i
>> >             am not allowed even make such minor(which i not a routine),
>> >             why shouldn't i ask you to take the files down?
>> >
>> >
>> >         or, rather, a small issue turns into a scene about how clean
>> >         Qemu is. why not take down all my dirty code?
>> >
>> >
>> >     look i'm resending this patch and next time we're having this
>> >     conversation, i'll be defacing qemu.
>> >
>> > either you have to update my code to what i think it should look like or
>> > you have to take down - wtf
>> >
>> > then you try to cook rubbish over it.
>>
>> Hey, calm down. Paolo said that he'd queue your patch, so it will
>> eventually get applied. But that just might take some time, the
>> maintainers only send PULL requests for their queued patches after a
>> couple of days. So relax, wait some days, and if your patch still did
>> not get applied in a week, then you can start complaining again.
>>
>
> i'll not complain again, i'm make a patch to clean my code from your
> codebase.
>


Qemu have never been important to me like it's important to the maintainers.



>
>
>>
>>  Thomas
>>
>