qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration/rdma: Fix qemu_rdma_cleanup null chec


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration/rdma: Fix qemu_rdma_cleanup null check
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:00:56 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

* Peter Xu (address@hidden) wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:53:51PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden>
> > 
> > If the migration fails before the channel is open (e.g. a bad
> > address) we end up in the cleanup with rdma->channel==NULL.
> > 
> > Spotted by Coverity: CID 1398634
> > Fixes: fbbaacab2758cb3f32a0
> > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  migration/rdma.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
> > index 54a3c11540..9fa3b176eb 100644
> > --- a/migration/rdma.c
> > +++ b/migration/rdma.c
> > @@ -2321,7 +2321,9 @@ static void qemu_rdma_cleanup(RDMAContext *rdma)
> >          rdma->connected = false;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    qemu_set_fd_handler(rdma->channel->fd, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > +    if (rdma->channel) {
> > +        qemu_set_fd_handler(rdma->channel->fd, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> > +    }
> 
> IIUC there's no strict ordering constraint on resetting the fd
> handler, then how about simply moving this line into the below "if
> (rdma->channel)" altogether?

The logic around the closing of the return path makes that check later a
bit messy; rdma->channel can get set to Null before the other check.

Dave

> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Peter Xu
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]