qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/13] spapr/xics: ignore the lower 4K in the IR


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/13] spapr/xics: ignore the lower 4K in the IRQ number space
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:06:43 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:39:45PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The IRQ number space of the XIVE and XICS interrupt mode are aligned
> when using the dual interrupt mode for the machine. This means that
> the ICS offset is set to zero in QEMU and that the KVM XICS device
> should be informed of this new value. Unfortunately, there is now way
> to do so and KVM still maintains the XICS_IRQ_BASE (0x1000) offset.
> 
> Ignore the lower 4K which are not used under the XICS interrupt
> mode. These IRQ numbers are only claimed by XIVE for the CPU IPIs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/intc/xics_kvm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/intc/xics_kvm.c b/hw/intc/xics_kvm.c
> index 651bbfdf6966..1d21ff217b82 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/xics_kvm.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/xics_kvm.c
> @@ -238,6 +238,15 @@ static void ics_get_kvm_state(ICSState *ics)
>      for (i = 0; i < ics->nr_irqs; i++) {
>          ICSIRQState *irq = &ics->irqs[i];
>  
> +        /*
> +         * The KVM XICS device considers that the IRQ numbers should
> +         * start at XICS_IRQ_BASE (0x1000). Ignore the lower 4K
> +         * numbers (only claimed by XIVE for the CPU IPIs).
> +         */
> +        if (i + ics->offset < XICS_IRQ_BASE) {
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +

This seems bogus to me.  The guest-visible irq numbers need to line up
between xics and xive mode, yes, but that doesn't mean we need to keep
around a great big array of unused array of ICS irq states, even in
TCG mode.

>          kvm_device_access(kernel_xics_fd, KVM_DEV_XICS_GRP_SOURCES,
>                            i + ics->offset, &state, false, &error_fatal);
>  
> @@ -303,6 +312,15 @@ static int ics_set_kvm_state(ICSState *ics, int 
> version_id)
>          ICSIRQState *irq = &ics->irqs[i];
>          int ret;
>  
> +        /*
> +         * The KVM XICS device considers that the IRQ numbers should
> +         * start at XICS_IRQ_BASE (0x1000). Ignore the lower 4K
> +         * numbers (only claimed by XIVE for the CPU IPIs).
> +         */
> +        if (i + ics->offset < XICS_IRQ_BASE) {
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
>          state = irq->server;
>          state |= (uint64_t)(irq->saved_priority & KVM_XICS_PRIORITY_MASK)
>              << KVM_XICS_PRIORITY_SHIFT;

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]