qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] should we try to stop using variable length arrays?


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] should we try to stop using variable length arrays?
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 13:39:30 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0

On 2/7/19 1:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Currently QEMU has 9 uses of variable length arrays
> (found using -Wvla):
> 

> 
> Should we be looking to get rid of these and turn on the -Wvla
> warning? I know the Linux kernel has recently decided to do this
> (some rationale at the start of https://lwn.net/Articles/749064/).
> Now that doesn't necessarily apply to us as a userspace program,

But systemd-journal is a userspace program bit by VLA:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/01/09/3

So the gnulib project recently switched to making it easier to disable VLA:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2019-01/msg00110.html

> but on the other hand if any of these were allowing the guest to
> determine the size of an on-stack array that would not be great.
> (The linux-user one is bogus in that way, though not a security issue
> as the guest code there has full control anyway.)
> 
> Opinions? I admit that to some extent this is just my sense of
> tidiness thinking that if we only have a handful of uses of
> something we should squash that down to zero :-)

I'm all for removing it. (Hmm, I should update BiteSizedTasks to call
out general compiler-driven cleanups, calling out both -Wshadow and
-Wvla as separate subtasks in that category)

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]