qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 for-4.0 04/11] qemu_thread: supplement error


From: fei
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 for-4.0 04/11] qemu_thread: supplement error handling for pci_edu_realize
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 12:44:22 +0800


> 在 2019年2月1日,20:58,Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> 写道:
> 
> Fei Li <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> From: Fei Li <address@hidden>
>> 
>> Utilize the existed errp to propagate the error and do the
>> corresponding cleanup to replace the temporary &error_abort.
>> 
>> Cc: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Jiri Slaby <address@hidden>
>> Signed-off-by: Fei Li <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/misc/edu.c | 11 ++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/hw/misc/edu.c b/hw/misc/edu.c
>> index 21adbfddce..8fe232b6d6 100644
>> --- a/hw/misc/edu.c
>> +++ b/hw/misc/edu.c
>> @@ -356,9 +356,14 @@ static void pci_edu_realize(PCIDevice *pdev, Error 
>> **errp)
>> 
>>     qemu_mutex_init(&edu->thr_mutex);
>>     qemu_cond_init(&edu->thr_cond);
>> -    /* TODO: let the further caller handle the error instead of abort() 
>> here */
>> -    qemu_thread_create(&edu->thread, "edu", edu_fact_thread,
>> -                       edu, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE, &error_abort);
>> +    if (qemu_thread_create(&edu->thread, "edu", edu_fact_thread,
>> +                           edu, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE, errp) < 0) {
>> +        qemu_cond_destroy(&edu->thr_cond);
>> +        qemu_mutex_destroy(&edu->thr_mutex);
>> +        timer_del(&edu->dma_timer);
>> +        msi_uninit(pdev);
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> 
>>     memory_region_init_io(&edu->mmio, OBJECT(edu), &edu_mmio_ops, edu,
>>                     "edu-mmio", 1 * MiB);
> 
> In review of v9, I pointed out that pci_edu_uninit() neglects to call
> msix_uninit(), and you offered to fix it.  Not in this series.  Do you
> still intend to fix it?
Yes, I have already sent that patch separately as I consider it is little 
relevant. And that patch has been merged. :)
> 
> That's a separate patch, though, so
> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
Thanks for the review!

Have a nice day
Fei



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]