Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/6] rdma: check num_sge does not exceed MAX_SGE

[Yuval Shaia]

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:17:21PM +0530, P J P wrote:
> From: Prasad J Pandit <address@hidden>
> 
> rdma back-end has scatter/gather array ibv_sge[MAX_SGE=4] set
> to have 4 elements. A guest could send a 'PvrdmaSqWqe' ring element
> with 'num_sge' set to > MAX_SGE, which may lead to OOB access issue.
> Add check to avoid it.
> 
> Reported-by: Saar Amar <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Update v1: use new error code VENDOR_ERR_INV_NUM_SGE
>   -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-12/msg02220.html
> 
> diff --git a/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c b/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c
> index ae1e4dcb29..bd4710d16f 100644
> --- a/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c
> +++ b/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c
> @@ -476,9 +476,9 @@ void rdma_backend_post_send(RdmaBackendDev *backend_dev,
>      }
>  
>      pr_dbg("num_sge=%d\n", num_sge);
> -    if (!num_sge) {
> -        pr_dbg("num_sge=0\n");
> -        complete_work(IBV_WC_GENERAL_ERR, VENDOR_ERR_NO_SGE, ctx);
> +    if (!num_sge || num_sge > MAX_SGE) {
> +        pr_dbg("invalid num_sge=%d\n", num_sge);
> +        complete_work(IBV_WC_GENERAL_ERR, VENDOR_ERR_INV_NUM_SGE, ctx);
>          return;
>      }
>  
> @@ -603,9 +603,9 @@ void rdma_backend_post_recv(RdmaBackendDev *backend_dev,
>      }
>  
>      pr_dbg("num_sge=%d\n", num_sge);
> -    if (!num_sge) {
> -        pr_dbg("num_sge=0\n");
> -        complete_work(IBV_WC_GENERAL_ERR, VENDOR_ERR_NO_SGE, ctx);
> +    if (!num_sge || num_sge > MAX_SGE) {
> +        pr_dbg("invalid num_sge=%d\n", num_sge);
> +        complete_work(IBV_WC_GENERAL_ERR, VENDOR_ERR_INV_NUM_SGE, ctx);
>          return;
>      }

Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <address@hidden>

>  
> -- 
> 2.19.2
>