qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 4/4] RISC-V: Respect fences for user-only emulato


From: Michael Clark
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 4/4] RISC-V: Respect fences for user-only emulators
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:32:08 +1300

Nits. Please improve your commit message to make them more impersonal...

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:52 PM Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden> wrote:

> Our current fence implementation ignores fences for the user-only
> configurations.  This is incorrect but unlikely to manifest: it requires
> multi-threaded user-only code that takes advantage of the weakness in
> the host's memory model and can be inlined by TCG.
>

The RISC-V fence implementation...


> This patch simply treats fences the same way for all our emulators.
> I've given it to testing as I don't want to construct a test that would
> actually trigger the failure.
>

Testing has been limited to... ? Reproducer?


> Our fence implementation has an additional deficiency where we map all
> RISC-V fences to full fences.  Now that we have a formal memory model
> for RISC-V we can start to take advantage of the strength bits on our
> fence instructions.  This requires a bit more though, so I'm going to
> split it out because the implementation is still correct without taking
> advantage of these weaker fences.
>

The fence implementation...

A formal memory model for RISC-V allows...


> Thanks to Richard Henderson for pointing out both of the issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>


Assuming you fix up the commit message. I am not sure if I am present in
any of the commit messages I wrote, however perhaps thats just a matter
style with respect to writing (or re-writing) history.

Reviewed-by: Michael Clark <address@hidden>

---
>  target/riscv/translate.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/translate.c b/target/riscv/translate.c
> index f44eb9c41b48..312bf298b3c2 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/translate.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/translate.c
> @@ -1776,7 +1776,6 @@ static void decode_RV32_64G(CPURISCVState *env,
> DisasContext *ctx)
>                       GET_RM(ctx->opcode));
>          break;
>      case OPC_RISC_FENCE:
> -#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>          if (ctx->opcode & 0x1000) {
>              /* FENCE_I is a no-op in QEMU,
>               * however we need to end the translation block */
> @@ -1787,7 +1786,6 @@ static void decode_RV32_64G(CPURISCVState *env,
> DisasContext *ctx)
>              /* FENCE is a full memory barrier. */
>              tcg_gen_mb(TCG_MO_ALL | TCG_BAR_SC);
>          }
> -#endif
>          break;
>      case OPC_RISC_SYSTEM:
>          gen_system(env, ctx, MASK_OP_SYSTEM(ctx->opcode), rd, rs1,
> --
> 2.18.1
>
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]