qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/45] Machine queue, 2018-10-18


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/45] Machine queue, 2018-10-18
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:53:45 +0200

On Fri, 19 Oct 2018 15:44:08 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 03:12:31PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 18 October 2018 at 21:03, Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit 
> > > 09558375a634e17cea6cfbfec883ac2376d2dc7f:
> > >
> > >   Merge remote-tracking branch 
> > > 'remotes/pmaydell/tags/pull-target-arm-20181016-1' into staging 
> > > (2018-10-16 17:42:56 +0100)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > >   git://github.com/ehabkost/qemu.git tags/machine-next-pull-request
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 6d8e1bcc7dd5e819ce81e6a87fffe23e39c700cc:
> > >
> > >   numa: Clean up error reporting in parse_numa() (2018-10-17 16:33:40 
> > > -0300)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Machine queue, 2018-10-18
> > >
> > > * sysbus init/realize cleanups
> > >   (Cédric Le Goater, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé)
> > > * memory-device refactoring (David Hildenbrand)
> > > * -smp: deprecate incorrect CPUs topology (Igor Mammedov)
> > > * -numa parsing cleanups (Markus Armbruster)
> > > * Fix hostmem-file memory leak (Zhang Yi)
> > > * Typo fix (Li Qiang)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > 
> > Hi. This had some problems in merge testing, I'm afraid:
> > 
> > On aarch64 host, warnings running tests/cpu-plug-test for i386 and s390 
> > targets:
> > 
> > TEST: tests/cpu-plug-test... (pid=12602)
> >   /i386/cpu-plug/pc-i440fx-3.0/cpu-add/1x3x2&maxcpus=12:
> > qemu-system-i386: warning: Invalid CPU topology deprecated: sockets
> > (1) * cores (3) * threads (2) != maxcpus (12)
> [...]
> > 
> > (plus similar ppc64, x86_64 targets)
> 
> Ouch.  Apologies.
> 
> Can we please do something make sure "make check" will fail on
> these cases?  I'd like to be able to trust CI systems like
> travis-ci.
> 

we probably don't want make check fail on warning.
Test was written with assumption that s/c/t tuples matches initially present 
CPUs, hence a warning.
Would something like following fix the issue (local x86 build/test looks fixed 
with it)?

diff --git a/tests/cpu-plug-test.c b/tests/cpu-plug-test.c
index 3e93c8e..f4a677d 100644
--- a/tests/cpu-plug-test.c
+++ b/tests/cpu-plug-test.c
@@ -32,12 +32,12 @@ static void test_plug_with_cpu_add(gconstpointer data)
     unsigned int i;
 
     args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s -cpu %s "
-                           "-smp sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
+                           "-smp 1,sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
                            s->machine, s->cpu_model,
                            s->sockets, s->cores, s->threads, s->maxcpus);
     qtest_start(args);
 
-    for (i = s->sockets * s->cores * s->threads; i < s->maxcpus; i++) {
+    for (i = 1; i < s->maxcpus; i++) {
         response = qmp("{ 'execute': 'cpu-add',"
                        "  'arguments': { 'id': %d } }", i);
         g_assert(response);
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static void test_plug_without_cpu_add(gconstpointer data)
     QDict *response;
 
     args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s -cpu %s "
-                           "-smp sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
+                           "-smp 1,sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
                            s->machine, s->cpu_model,
                            s->sockets, s->cores, s->threads, s->maxcpus);
     qtest_start(args);
@@ -79,12 +79,12 @@ static void test_plug_with_device_add_x86(gconstpointer 
data)
     unsigned int s, c, t;
 
     args = g_strdup_printf("-machine %s -cpu %s "
-                           "-smp sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
+                           "-smp 1,sockets=%u,cores=%u,threads=%u,maxcpus=%u",
                            td->machine, td->cpu_model,
                            td->sockets, td->cores, td->threads, td->maxcpus);
     qtest_start(args);
 
-    for (s = td->sockets; s < td->maxcpus / td->cores / td->threads; s++) {
+    for (s = 1; s < td->sockets; s++) {
         for (c = 0; c < td->cores; c++) {
             for (t = 0; t < td->threads; t++) {
                 char *id = g_strdup_printf("id-%i-%i-%i", s, c, t);
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void test_plug_with_device_add_coreid(gconstpointer 
data)
                            td->sockets, td->cores, td->threads, td->maxcpus);
     qtest_start(args);
 
-    for (c = td->cores; c < td->maxcpus / td->sockets / td->threads; c++) {
+    for (c = 1; c < td->cores; c++) {
         char *id = g_strdup_printf("id-%i", c);
         qtest_qmp_device_add(td->device_model, id, "{'core-id':%u}", c);
         g_free(id);
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static void add_pc_test_case(const char *mname)
     data->sockets = 1;
     data->cores = 3;
     data->threads = 2;
-    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads * 2;
+    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads;
     if (g_str_has_suffix(mname, "-1.4") ||
         (strcmp(mname, "pc-1.3") == 0) ||
         (strcmp(mname, "pc-1.2") == 0) ||
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void add_pseries_test_case(const char *mname)
     data->sockets = 2;
     data->cores = 3;
     data->threads = 1;
-    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads * 2;
+    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads;
 
     path = g_strdup_printf("cpu-plug/%s/device-add/%ux%ux%u&maxcpus=%u",
                            mname, data->sockets, data->cores,
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void add_s390x_test_case(const char *mname)
     data->sockets = 1;
     data->cores = 3;
     data->threads = 1;
-    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads * 2;
+    data->maxcpus = data->sockets * data->cores * data->threads;
 
     data2 = g_memdup(data, sizeof(PlugTestData));
     data2->machine = g_strdup(data->machine);





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]