qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: set cross_cc_FOO from cc, not host_c


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: set cross_cc_FOO from cc, not host_cc
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 13:49:36 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 2018-10-19 12:43, Alex Bennée wrote:
> The purpose of the code is to use the designated compiler for building
> the targets test cases. This is not actually host_cc which will still
> be cc even when we are cross compiling. As the tests for $cpu all use
> $cc we should do the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> Reported-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  configure | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 9138af37f8..d6605bd633 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -717,37 +717,37 @@ case "$cpu" in
>    ppc|ppc64|s390|s390x|sparc64|x32)
>      cpu="$cpu"
>      supported_cpu="yes"
> -    eval "cross_cc_${cpu}=\$host_cc"
> +    eval "cross_cc_${cpu}=\$cc"
>    ;;
>    i386|i486|i586|i686|i86pc|BePC)
>      cpu="i386"
>      supported_cpu="yes"
> -    cross_cc_i386=$host_cc
> +    cross_cc_i386=$cc
>    ;;
>    x86_64|amd64)
>      cpu="x86_64"
>      supported_cpu="yes"
> -    cross_cc_x86_64=$host_cc
> +    cross_cc_x86_64=$cc
>    ;;
>    armv*b|armv*l|arm)
>      cpu="arm"
>      supported_cpu="yes"
> -    cross_cc_arm=$host_cc
> +    cross_cc_arm=$cc
>    ;;
>    aarch64)
>      cpu="aarch64"
>      supported_cpu="yes"
> -    cross_cc_aarch64=$host_cc
> +    cross_cc_aarch64=$cc
>    ;;
>    mips*)
>      cpu="mips"
>      supported_cpu="yes"
> -    cross_cc_mips=$host_cc
> +    cross_cc_mips=$cc
>    ;;
>    sparc|sun4[cdmuv])
>      cpu="sparc"
>      supported_cpu="yes"
> -    cross_cc_sparc=$host_cc
> +    cross_cc_sparc=$cc
>    ;;
>    *)
>      # This will result in either an error or falling back to TCI later
> 

Sounds like the right thing to do.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]