qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Acceptance tests: host arch to target arch name


From: Cleber Rosa
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Acceptance tests: host arch to target arch name mapping
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:46:57 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0


On 10/17/18 12:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:31:56PM -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/17/18 8:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 17 October 2018 at 00:22, Cleber Rosa <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> The host arch name is not always the target arch name, so it's
>>>> necessary to have a mapping.
>>>>
>>>> The configure scripts contains what is the authoritative and failproof
>>>> mapping, but, reusing it is not straightforward, so it's replicated in
>>>> the acceptance tests supporting code.
>>>
>>> So, why does the test code need to care? It's not clear
>>> from the patch... My expectation would be that you'd
>>> just test all the testable target architectures,
>>> regardless of what the host architecture is.
>>>
>>
>> That's a good question, and now I realize that I could have given more
>> information on the commit message (fixing it).
>>
>> The core issue is that when running tests and a QEMU binary is not
>> explicitly chosen, we pick one first from the build tree (then from
>> system) that matches the host architecture.
>>
>> Without such a mapping, when running tests say on a host arch ppc64le, a
>> QEMU binary will not be found.  This was first mentioned here:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-10/msg00865.html
> 
> The configure script knows what the matching target for this host
> arch is. Can you just make it set a makefile variable you can then
> pick up ?
> 

That looks like the right approach when doing something like "make
check-acceptance".

But, tying the (Python) test code to information from the generated
Makefiles is something we tried before and was mostly rejected[1].

One strong (new) reason for not having that dependency are the packaged
tests (say a qemu-tests RPM) that should be able to run on environments
such as Fedora CI.

Thanks for the input!
- Cleber.

[1] - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg06757.html

> Regards,
> Daniel
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]