qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Suppress address-of-packed-membe


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] linux-user: Suppress address-of-packed-member warnings in __get/put_user_e
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 20:33:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 09/10/2018 18:18, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Our __get_user_e() and __put_user_e() macros cause newer versions
> of clang to generate false-positive -Waddress-of-packed-member
> warnings if they are passed the address of a member of a packed
> struct (see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39113).
> Suppress these using the _Pragma() operator. Unfortunately
> _Pragma() support in gcc is broken in some gcc versions and
> in some usage contexts, so we limit the pragma usage here to clang.
> 
> To put in the pragmas we need to convert the macros from
> expressions to statements, but all the callsites effectively
> treat them as statements already so this is OK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> Changes v1->v2: _Pragma() in gcc appears to be a disaster area;
> limit the use of it to clang only, since it's just clang that
> emits the bogus warning in this case. Tested on clang-3.8.0,
> clang-7, gcc 5.4.0 and gcc 8.0.1.
> 
>  linux-user/qemu.h | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 

Applied to my branch linux-user-for-3.1

Thanks,
Laurent



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]