[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] hw/s390x/ipl: Fix alignment problems of
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] hw/s390x/ipl: Fix alignment problems of S390IPLState members |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:46:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
On 2018-09-26 11:42, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:38:45 +0200
> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> The IplParameterBlock and QemuIplParameters structures are declared
>> with QEMU_PACKED, so the compiler assumes that the structures do not
>> need to be aligned in memory. Since the are listed after a "bool"
>> within the S390IPLState, the IplParameterBlock and QemuIplParameters
>> are also indeed mis-aligned in memory. This causes problems on Sparc
>> during migration, since we use VMSTATE_UINT16 in vmstate_iplb to access
>> the devno member for example, and the corresponding migration functions
>> (like qemu_get_be16s) then try to access a 16-bit value from a mis-
>> aligned memory address.
>> The easiest solution to fix this problem is to move the packed structures
>> to the beginning of the S390IPLState. Also add some additional comments
>> here to prevent that this problem will be introduced again in the future.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/ipl.h | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.h b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>> index 4e87b89..b3a07a1 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.h
>> @@ -132,15 +132,15 @@ typedef struct QemuIplParameters QemuIplParameters;
>> struct S390IPLState {
>> /*< private >*/
>> DeviceState parent_obj;
>> + IplParameterBlock iplb;
>> + QemuIplParameters qipl;
>
> Hm... this is not quite the beginning of the structure; what am I
> missing?
DeviceState of course has to stay first for QOM reasons. But since it is
a non-packed struct, we can be sure that it will be padded to the
correct alignment at the end. If not, the QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG in this
patch will tell us.
Thomas
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from struct SenseId, Thomas Huth, 2018/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from struct SenseId, David Hildenbrand, 2018/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from struct SenseId, David Hildenbrand, 2018/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from struct SenseId, Thomas Huth, 2018/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from struct SenseId, David Hildenbrand, 2018/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from struct SenseId, Thomas Huth, 2018/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v2 2/3] hw/s390x/css: Remove QEMU_PACKED from struct SenseId, David Hildenbrand, 2018/09/26