qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] net: Silence 'has no peer' messages in test


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] net: Silence 'has no peer' messages in testing mode
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:57:21 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 14/08/2018 17:43, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 08/14/2018 05:33 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 14/08/2018 16:46, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> When running qtests with -nodefaults, we are not interested in
>>> these 'XYZ has no peer' messages.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  vl.c | 3 +--
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
>>> index 16b913f..7055df3 100644
>>> --- a/vl.c
>>> +++ b/vl.c
>>> @@ -4559,11 +4559,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>>>       * (2) CONFIG_SLIRP not set, in which case the implicit "-net nic"
>>>       * sets up a nic that isn't connected to anything.
>>>       */
>>> -    if (!default_net) {
>>> +    if (!default_net && (!qtest_enabled() || has_defaults)) {
>>>          net_check_clients();
>>>      }
>>>  
>>
>> Why does it have no peer?  Not a nack, just curiosity.
> 
> The machines which emulate an embedded system often always create a NIC
> (since it is hard-wired on the board, not optional). But since there is
> no back-end on the host side with "-nodefaults", the net_check_clients()
> function complains in this case.

Ok, the has_defaults test then makes sense.  Is the qtest_enabled() part
still needed, or is the message unnecessary even in normal operation?

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]