qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/56] check-qjson: Cover blank and lexically er


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/56] check-qjson: Cover blank and lexically erroneous input
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 08:29:03 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

On 08/08/2018 07:02 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
qobject_from_json() can return null without setting an error on
lexical errors.  I call that a bug.  Add test coverage to demonstrate
it.

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
---
  tests/check-qjson.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


+static void junk_input(void)
+{
+    /* Note: junk within strings is covered elsewhere */
+    Error *err = NULL;
+    QObject *obj;
+
+    obj = qobject_from_json("@", &err);

Invalid token

+    g_assert(!err);             /* BUG */
+    g_assert(obj == NULL);
+
+    obj = qobject_from_json("[0\xFF]", &err);

\xff stream reset, followed by unbalanced ]

+    error_free_or_abort(&err);
+    g_assert(obj == NULL);
+
+    obj = qobject_from_json("00", &err);

Invalid as a JSON number

+    g_assert(!err);             /* BUG */
+    g_assert(obj == NULL);
+
+    obj = qobject_from_json("[1e", &err);

Incomplete as a JSON number

+    g_assert(!err);             /* BUG */
      g_assert(obj == NULL);
  }

Is it also worth testing:

"t" (incomplete as a JSON literal)
"a" (not a valid JSON literal, but alphabetic and thus different from the "@" test above)

At any rate, with or without further tests this is good improved coverage dealt with in the rest of the series.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]