qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: 222: Don't run with luks


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: 222: Don't run with luks
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:45:36 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

Am 10.07.2018 um 17:34 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> 
> 
> On 07/10/2018 05:38 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Luks needs special parameters to operate the image. Since this test is
> > focusing on image fleecing, skip skip that format.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/222 | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/222 b/tests/qemu-iotests/222
> > index ff3bfc1470..0ead56d574 100644
> > --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/222
> > +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/222
> > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ import iotests
> >  from iotests import log, qemu_img, qemu_io, qemu_io_silent
> >  
> >  iotests.verify_platform(['linux'])
> > +iotests.verify_image_format(supported_fmts=['qcow2', 'qcow', 'qed', 'vmdk',
> > +                                            'vhdx', 'raw'])
> >  
> >  patterns = [("0x5d", "0",         "64k"),
> >              ("0xd5", "1M",        "64k"),
> > 
> 
> Ah; do we not have a nicer way to exclude just one format? Evidently not.

iotest.verify_image_format() has an argument unsupported_fmts, but I
think a whitelist is better anyway.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]