qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.0] accel/tcg: Don't treat invalid TLB entr


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-3.0] accel/tcg: Don't treat invalid TLB entries as needing recheck
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:23:26 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

Le 29/06/2018 à 18:17, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> In get_page_addr_code() when we check whether the TLB entry
> is marked as TLB_RECHECK, we should not go down that code
> path if the TLB entry is not valid at all (ie the TLB_INVALID
> bit is set).
> 
> Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> This fixes the abort that Laurent was seeing with his m68k test case.
> 
>  accel/tcg/cputlb.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
> index eebe97dabb7..a55296583b9 100644
> --- a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
> +++ b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c
> @@ -967,7 +967,8 @@ tb_page_addr_t get_page_addr_code(CPUArchState *env, 
> target_ulong addr)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    if (unlikely(env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addr_code & TLB_RECHECK)) {
> +    if (unlikely((env->tlb_table[mmu_idx][index].addr_code &
> +                  (TLB_RECHECK | TLB_INVALID_MASK)) == TLB_RECHECK)) {
>          /*
>           * This is a TLB_RECHECK access, where the MMU protection
>           * covers a smaller range than a target page, and we must
> 

Thank you!

Tested-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]