qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] sysbus: always allow explicit_ofw_unit_a


From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] sysbus: always allow explicit_ofw_unit_address() to override address generation
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 18:04:02 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0

On 06/29/18 15:56, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Some SysBusDevices either use sysbus_init_mmio() without
> sysbus_mmio_map() or the first MMIO memory region doesn't represent the
> bus address, causing a firmware device path with an invalid address to
> be generated.
> 
> SysBusDeviceClass does provide a virtual explicit_ofw_unit_address()
> method that can be used to override this process, but it was originally 
> intended
> only as as a fallback option meaning that any existing MMIO memory regions 
> still
> take priority whilst determining the firmware device address.
> 
> There is currently only one user of explicit_ofw_unit_address() and that
> is the PCI expander bridge (PXB) device which has no MMIO/PIO resources
> defined. This enables us to allow explicit_ofw_unit_address() to take
> priority without affecting backwards compatibility, allowing the address
> to be customised as required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/core/sysbus.c | 15 +++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/core/sysbus.c b/hw/core/sysbus.c
> index ecfb0cfc0e..1ee0c162f4 100644
> --- a/hw/core/sysbus.c
> +++ b/hw/core/sysbus.c
> @@ -293,16 +293,8 @@ static char *sysbus_get_fw_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
>  {
>      SysBusDevice *s = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);
>      SysBusDeviceClass *sbc = SYS_BUS_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(s);
> -    /* for the explicit unit address fallback case: */
>      char *addr, *fw_dev_path;
>  
> -    if (s->num_mmio) {
> -        return g_strdup_printf("%s@" TARGET_FMT_plx, qdev_fw_name(dev),
> -                               s->mmio[0].addr);
> -    }
> -    if (s->num_pio) {
> -        return g_strdup_printf("address@hidden", qdev_fw_name(dev), 
> s->pio[0]);
> -    }
>      if (sbc->explicit_ofw_unit_address) {
>          addr = sbc->explicit_ofw_unit_address(s);
>          if (addr) {
> @@ -311,6 +303,13 @@ static char *sysbus_get_fw_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
>              return fw_dev_path;
>          }
>      }
> +    if (s->num_mmio) {
> +        return g_strdup_printf("%s@" TARGET_FMT_plx, qdev_fw_name(dev),
> +                               s->mmio[0].addr);
> +    }
> +    if (s->num_pio) {
> +        return g_strdup_printf("address@hidden", qdev_fw_name(dev), 
> s->pio[0]);
> +    }
>      return g_strdup(qdev_fw_name(dev));
>  }
>  
> 


Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]