qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ppc: Fix sam460ex devicetree when booting the L


From: Guenter Roeck
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ppc: Fix sam460ex devicetree when booting the Linux kernel
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 19:34:20 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:37:30PM +0200, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> 
> >>The version of the Linux kernel I've tried (which is from the Linux CD
> >>on ACube's site) did not try to access the power management register,
> >>neither any guest OSes I've tested with. Looks like it may be specific
> >>to the kernel config you're using.
> >>
> >Interesting. This is with the standard upstream kernel, using
> >canyonlands_defconfig.
> >The code seems to have been in the upstream kernel forever.
> 
> Maybe the Sam460ex specific image has some patches not in upstream kernel.
> 

Yes, it does. To start with, the DesignWare sata driver is different.

This is not the reason for the problem, though. canyonlands_defconfig
in the upstream kernel has CONFIG_SUSPEND enabled, but the configuration
used by aCube doesn't. The kernel code accessing the power management
registers is only enabled with CONFIG_SUSPEND.

> >>By the way, when I've tried with a more recent Linux kernel (4.15.10)
> >>I've noticed that the sm501 driver seemed like having endianness
> >>problems and thus did not find the chip, while it works with other older
> >>kernels made for sam460ex. I did not try to debug or bisect this yet. Do
> >>you know anything about that?
> >>
> >
> >No, I had not noticed. SM501 is disabled in the latest canyonlands_defconfig,
> >and I only use the serial console for my testing. It fails as far back as
> >3.18.y,
> >so I am not sure if this is a Linux or a qemu problem, or if it is a
> >problem that
> >was never fixed in the upstream kernel. What kernels did you try ?
> 

The problem is this (from the kernel diffs provided by aCube):

 #if defined(CONFIG_PPC32)
-#define smc501_readl(addr)             ioread32be((addr))
-#define smc501_writel(val, addr)       iowrite32be((val), (addr))
+#define smc501_readl(addr)             ioread32((addr))
+#define smc501_writel(val, addr)       iowrite32((val), (addr))
 #else
 #define smc501_readl(addr)             readl(addr)
 #define smc501_writel(val, addr)       writel(val, addr)

This is a bit fishy since the cpu is big endian and iowrite32be()
should be identical to iowrite32(), but apparently that is not the
case here. I don't think I'll have time to track this down, though.

Guenter



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]