[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Adopt the Gumstix computers-on-mod
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Adopt the Gumstix computers-on-module machines |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:30:03 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 |
Hi Peter,
On 06/06/2018 12:02 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 06/06/2018 11:53 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 06.06.2018 16:47, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> These COMs are hard to find, and the companie dropped the support
>
> "company" :/
>
>>> few years ago.
>>>
>>> Per the "Gumstix Product Changes, Known Issues, and EOL" pdf:
>>>
>>> - Phasing out: PXA270-based Verdex product line
>>> September 2012
>>>
>>> - Phasing out: PXA255-based Basix & Connex
>>> September 2009
>>>
>>> However there are still booting SD card image availables, very
>>> convenient to stress test the QEMU SD card implementation.
>>> Therefore I volunteer to keep an eye on this file, while it
>>> is useful for testing.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>> MAINTAINERS | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 41cd3736a9..1825deb762 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -491,9 +491,10 @@ F: include/hw/arm/digic.h
>>> F: hw/*/digic*
>>>
>>> Gumstix
>>> +M: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
>>> L: address@hidden
>>> L: address@hidden
>>> -S: Orphan
>>> +S: Odd Fixes
>>> F: hw/arm/gumstix.c
>>
>> Great! So we can also remove the Gumstix entries from
>> https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/LegacyRemoval ?
>
> I'll remove these now, eventually adding a new Gumstix COMs
> wiki entry when Avocados tests are merged, although reading
> the tests should be enough.
Do you agree with this patch? This is mostly to avoid removing these 2
boards in 2 releases from now. The datasheets are public so I can keep
an eye on them.
I already removed them from the "Future deprecated candidates" entry in
the Wiki.
Regards,
Phil.