qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Is there a way to package QEMU binaries?


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Is there a way to package QEMU binaries?
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:14:20 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:55:21AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:28:09AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:02:59PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:52:45AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > On 12 June 2018 at 07:24, Peter Xu <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > > For example, I wanted to compile QEMU once and install it on multiple
> > > > > systems.  What would be the suggested way to do so?
> > > > 
> > > > For this, I would recommend using whatever the packaging
> > > > format for those systems is. Eg for Debian use the existing
> > > > Debian QEMU packages, for Redhat systems use RPMs, etc.
> > > > If you want a newer version of QEMU than is in the distro's
> > > > packages, you can probably forward port the packaging parts
> > > > to a newer QEMU without too much pain.
> > > > 
> > > > Or you can use a distro-agnostic packaging tool of some sort;
> > > > there are a few out there but I have no particular recommendations.
> > > 
> > > I'll start my investigation with RPM first.  Thanks Peter.
> > 
> > If you're interested in Fedora, I maintain a Copr repository which
> > provides RPMs for every QEMU version since 1.4.0 and every libvirt
> > version since 1.2.0...
> > 
> >   https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/berrange/virt-ark/
> > 
> > Yeah, Fedora 28 is missing, but I'll be adding it real soon.
> 
> Good to know this.
> 
> Then is there an easy way to port the specfile and tools to QEMU
> repository so that we can pack that even with a git tree?

The QEMU spec I'm using for virt-ark is very much cut-down and simplified
and doesn't try to follow best practices for packaging [1]

Well if we want to have a RPM spec file for QEMU distributed with upstream
QEMU, then I think it would be better todo what libvirt does[2], and simply
have the real Fedora  specfile kept in QEMU git [3].

Regards,
Daniel

[1] https://pagure.io/virt-ark/blob/master/f/qemu-ark.spec.in
[2] https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blob;f=libvirt.spec.in;hb=HEAD
[3] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qemu/blob/master/f/qemu.spec
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]