qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 3/5] i386: Enable TOPOEXT feature on AMD EPY


From: Moger, Babu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 3/5] i386: Enable TOPOEXT feature on AMD EPYC CPU
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:12:48 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
> On Behalf Of Moger, Babu
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 1:11 PM
> To: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; Jiri
> Denemark <address@hidden>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v13 3/5] i386: Enable TOPOEXT feature on AMD EPYC
> CPU
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eduardo Habkost [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 12:18 PM
> > To: Moger, Babu <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden;
> > address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> > address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; Jiri
> > Denemark <address@hidden>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 3/5] i386: Enable TOPOEXT feature on AMD EPYC
> > CPU
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 04:52:18PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > What do you think our options are here?
> > >
> > > Should we drop automatic topoext completely and move forward?
> > > What are your thoughts?
> >
> > Let's drop automatic topoext by now, and see if we find solutions
> > later.  I don't want to hold the rest of the patches because of
> > this.
> 
> Ok. I will drop topoext.

Sorry, I mean automatic topoext.

> 
> >
> > I'm thinking we could simply make kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid()
> > always return TOPOEXT on AMD CPUs, because the feature flag don't
> > really depend on any KVM code to work (is that correct?).
> 
> Yes, that is correct. I don't see any dependent code on TOPOEXT in KVM
> driver.
> 
> Ok. Let me add TOPOEXT flag for all the AMD cpus and see how it goes.
> 
> >
> > --
> > Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]