qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: introduce decompress-error-check


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: introduce decompress-error-check
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 15:57:13 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13)

* Peter Xu (address@hidden) wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 06:40:09PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 04/27/2018 05:31 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:15:37AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On 04/26/2018 10:01 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > > > On 04/26/2018 04:15 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> > > > > > From: Xiao Guangrong <address@hidden>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > QEMU 2.13 enables strict check for compression & decompression to
> > > > > > make the migration more robuster, that depends on the source to fix
> > > > > 
> > > > > s/robuster/robust/
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Will fix, thank you for pointing it out.
> > > > 
> > > > > > the internal design which triggers the unexpected error conditions
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2.13 hasn't been released yet.  Why do we need a knob to explicitly 
> > > > > turn
> > > > > off strict checking?  Can we not instead make 2.13 automatically smart
> > > > > enough to tell if the incoming stream is coming from an older qemu
> > > > > (which might fail if the strict checks are enabled) vs. a newer qemu
> > > > > (the sender gave us what we need to ensure the strict checks are
> > > > > worthwhile)?
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Really smart.
> > > > 
> > > > How about introduce a new command, MIG_CMD_DECOMPRESS_ERR_CHECK,
> > > > the destination will do strict check if got this command (i.e, new
> > > > QEMU is running on the source), otherwise, turn the check off.
> > > 
> > > Why not we just introduce a compat bit for that?  I mean something
> > > like: 15c3850325 ("migration: move skip_section_footers",
> > > 2017-06-28).  Then we turn that check bit off for <=2.12.
> > > 
> > > Would that work?
> > 
> > I am afraid it can not. :(
> > 
> > The compat bit only impacts local behavior, however, in this case, we
> > need the source QEMU to tell the destination if it supports strict
> > error check.
> 
> My understanding is that the new compat bit will only take effect when
> at destination.
> 
> I'm not sure I'm thinking that correctly. I'll give some examples.
> 
> When we migrate from <2.12 to 2.13, on 2.13 QEMU we'll possibly with
> (using q35 as example, always) "-M pc-q35-2.12" to make the migration
> work, so this will let the destination QEMU stop checking
> decompressing errors.  IMHO that's what we want so it's fine (forward
> migration).
> 
> When we migrate from 2.13 to <2.12, on 2.12 it'll always skip checking
> decompression errors, so it's fine too even if we don't send some
> compress-errored pages.
> 
> Then, would this mean that the compat bit could work too just like
> this patch?  AFAIU the compat bit idea is very similar to current
> patch, however we don't really need a new parameter to make things
> complicated, we just let old QEMUs behave differently and
> automatically, then user won't need to worry about manually specify
> that parameter.

I think you're saying just to wire it to the machine type for receive;
that would work and would be fairly simple, although wouldn't provide
the protection when going from new->new using an old machine type.

Dave

> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Peter Xu
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]