qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mux: fix ctrl-a b again


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mux: fix ctrl-a b again
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:51:13 +0100

On 16 April 2018 at 19:44, Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 07:28:28PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 16 April 2018 at 19:18, Marc-André Lureau
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Commit fb5e19d2e1472e96d72d5e4d89c20033f8ab345c originally fixed the
>> > regression, but was inadvertently broken again in merge commit
>> > 2d6752d38d8acda.
>> >
>> > Fixes:
>> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1654137
>> >
>> > Cc: address@hidden
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> >  chardev/char-mux.c | 1 +
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/chardev/char-mux.c b/chardev/char-mux.c
>> > index 1b925c8dec..6055e76293 100644
>> > --- a/chardev/char-mux.c
>> > +++ b/chardev/char-mux.c
>> > @@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ void mux_set_focus(Chardev *chr, int focus)
>> >      }
>> >
>> >      d->focus = focus;
>> > +    chr->be = d->backends[focus];
>> >      mux_chr_send_event(d, d->focus, CHR_EVENT_MUX_IN);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > --
>> > 2.17.0.rc1.36.gcedb63ea2f
>>
>> Opinions welcome on whether this is a regression fix worth
>> putting into rc4.
>
> It is a regression, but a long standing one - we've been broken for quite
> a while since 2.9.0 or even before.
>
> If we're doing an rc4 anyway I'd suggest including it, but not the end of
> the world if it has to go in via -stable given how long we've been broken
> for.
>

Thanks for the clarification; I've applied this to master.

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]