[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [NOTFORMERGE PATCH v2 2/4] memory: Fix access_with_adju
|
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [NOTFORMERGE PATCH v2 2/4] memory: Fix access_with_adjusted_size() when size < access_size_min |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:21:18 -0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
On 04/04/2018 10:22 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> ASan reported:
>
> shift exponent 4294967280 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
> ...
> runtime error: shift exponent -16 is negative
>
> This can occurs when MemoryRegionOps .valid.min_access_size <
> .impl.min_access_size,
> for example if a guest uses a 16-bit operand to access a 32-bit register.
>
> The current code is limited to right shifting.
> Use a signed shift, to allow shifting left when the value is negative.
>
> Reported-by: AddressSanitizer
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> ---
> memory.c | 74
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c
> index 51d27b7b26..e77f9e4036 100644
> --- a/memory.c
> +++ b/memory.c
> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_oldmmio_read_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t *value,
> unsigned size,
> - unsigned shift,
> + signed shift,
> uint64_t mask,
> MemTxAttrs attrs)
> {
> @@ -422,7 +422,11 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_oldmmio_read_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr abs_addr = memory_region_to_absolute_addr(mr, addr);
> trace_memory_region_ops_read(get_cpu_index(), mr, abs_addr, tmp,
> size);
> }
> - *value |= (tmp & mask) << shift;
> + if (likely(shift >= 0)) {
> + *value |= (tmp & mask) << shift;
> + } else {
> + *value |= (tmp >> -shift) & mask;
> + }
> return MEMTX_OK;
> }
>
> @@ -430,7 +434,7 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_read_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t *value,
> unsigned size,
> - unsigned shift,
> + signed shift,
> uint64_t mask,
> MemTxAttrs attrs)
> {
> @@ -448,7 +452,11 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_read_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr abs_addr = memory_region_to_absolute_addr(mr, addr);
> trace_memory_region_ops_read(get_cpu_index(), mr, abs_addr, tmp,
> size);
> }
> - *value |= (tmp & mask) << shift;
> + if (likely(shift >= 0)) {
> + *value |= (tmp & mask) << shift;
> + } else {
> + *value |= (tmp >> -shift) & mask;
> + }
> return MEMTX_OK;
> }
>
> @@ -456,7 +464,7 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_read_with_attrs_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t *value,
> unsigned size,
> - unsigned shift,
> + signed shift,
> uint64_t mask,
> MemTxAttrs attrs)
> {
> @@ -475,7 +483,11 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_read_with_attrs_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr abs_addr = memory_region_to_absolute_addr(mr, addr);
> trace_memory_region_ops_read(get_cpu_index(), mr, abs_addr, tmp,
> size);
> }
> - *value |= (tmp & mask) << shift;
> + if (likely(shift >= 0)) {
> + *value |= (tmp & mask) << shift;
> + } else {
> + *value |= (tmp >> -shift) & mask;
> + }
> return r;
> }
>
> @@ -483,13 +495,17 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_oldmmio_write_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t *value,
> unsigned size,
> - unsigned shift,
> + signed shift,
> uint64_t mask,
> MemTxAttrs attrs)
> {
> uint64_t tmp;
>
> - tmp = (*value >> shift) & mask;
> + if (likely(shift >= 0)) {
> + tmp = (*value >> shift) & mask;
> + } else {
> + tmp = (*value & mask) << -shift;
> + }
> if (mr->subpage) {
> trace_memory_region_subpage_write(get_cpu_index(), mr, addr, tmp,
> size);
> } else if (mr == &io_mem_notdirty) {
> @@ -509,13 +525,17 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_write_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t *value,
> unsigned size,
> - unsigned shift,
> + signed shift,
> uint64_t mask,
> MemTxAttrs attrs)
> {
> uint64_t tmp;
>
> - tmp = (*value >> shift) & mask;
> + if (likely(shift >= 0)) {
> + tmp = (*value >> shift) & mask;
> + } else {
> + tmp = (*value & mask) << -shift;
> + }
> if (mr->subpage) {
> trace_memory_region_subpage_write(get_cpu_index(), mr, addr, tmp,
> size);
> } else if (mr == &io_mem_notdirty) {
> @@ -535,13 +555,17 @@ static MemTxResult
> memory_region_write_with_attrs_accessor(MemoryRegion *mr,
> hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t *value,
> unsigned size,
> - unsigned shift,
> + signed shift,
> uint64_t mask,
> MemTxAttrs attrs)
> {
> uint64_t tmp;
>
> - tmp = (*value >> shift) & mask;
> + if (likely(shift >= 0)) {
> + tmp = (*value >> shift) & mask;
> + } else {
> + tmp = (*value & mask) << -shift;
> + }
> if (mr->subpage) {
> trace_memory_region_subpage_write(get_cpu_index(), mr, addr, tmp,
> size);
> } else if (mr == &io_mem_notdirty) {
> @@ -566,7 +590,7 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr,
> hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t *value,
> unsigned size,
> - unsigned shift,
> + signed shift,
> uint64_t mask,
> MemTxAttrs attrs),
> MemoryRegion *mr,
> @@ -574,7 +598,9 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr addr,
> {
> uint64_t access_mask;
> unsigned access_size;
> - unsigned i;
> + hwaddr access_addr;
> + unsigned offset;
> + signed shift;
> MemTxResult r = MEMTX_OK;
>
> if (!access_size_min) {
> @@ -586,16 +612,20 @@ static MemTxResult access_with_adjusted_size(hwaddr
> addr,
>
> /* FIXME: support unaligned access? */
> access_size = MAX(MIN(size, access_size_max), access_size_min);
> - access_mask = -1ULL >> (64 - access_size * 8);
> - if (memory_region_big_endian(mr)) {
> - for (i = 0; i < size; i += access_size) {
> - r |= access_fn(mr, addr + i, value, access_size,
> - (size - access_size - i) * 8, access_mask, attrs);
> + access_mask = -1ULL >> (64 - size * 8);
> + access_addr = addr & ~(access_size - 1);
> + if (likely(size >= access_size)) {
> + offset = addr & (access_size - 1);
> + shift = access_size - size - offset;
> + if (!memory_region_big_endian(mr)) {
> + shift = -shift;
> }
Please disregard this patch, I hope the next respin will make more sens.
> + r = access_fn(mr, access_addr, value, access_size,
> + shift * 8, access_mask, attrs);
> } else {
> - for (i = 0; i < size; i += access_size) {
> - r |= access_fn(mr, addr + i, value, access_size, i * 8,
> - access_mask, attrs);
> + for (offset = 0; offset < size; offset += access_size) {
> + r |= access_fn(mr, access_addr + offset, value, access_size,
> + offset * 8, access_mask, attrs);
> }
> }
> return r;
>
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] memory: fix access_with_adjusted_size() and misc, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2018/04/04
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] memory: Avoid to create tiny RAM regions, handled as subpages, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2018/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] memory: Avoid to create tiny RAM regions, handled as subpages, Peter Maydell, 2018/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] memory: Avoid to create tiny RAM regions, handled as subpages, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2018/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] memory: Avoid to create tiny RAM regions, handled as subpages, Peter Maydell, 2018/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] memory: Avoid to create tiny RAM regions, handled as subpages, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2018/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] memory: Avoid to create tiny RAM regions, handled as subpages, KONRAD Frederic, 2018/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] memory: Avoid to create tiny RAM regions, handled as subpages, Peter Maydell, 2018/04/05
[Qemu-devel] [NOTFORMERGE PATCH v2 2/4] memory: Fix access_with_adjusted_size() when size < access_size_min, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2018/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [NOTFORMERGE PATCH v2 2/4] memory: Fix access_with_adjusted_size() when size < access_size_min,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] memory: Fix memory_region 'priority' property sign, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2018/04/04
[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] memory: Add memory_region_set_priority(), Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2018/04/04
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] memory: fix access_with_adjusted_size() and misc, no-reply, 2018/04/04